aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h32
-rw-r--r--lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp301
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count8.ll37
3 files changed, 253 insertions, 117 deletions
diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
index 274a3b5f58..d22f5e42af 100644
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h
@@ -337,19 +337,25 @@ namespace llvm {
/// found.
BasicBlock* getPredecessorWithUniqueSuccessorForBB(BasicBlock *BB);
- /// isNecessaryCond - Test whether the condition described by Pred, LHS,
- /// and RHS is a necessary condition for the given Cond value to evaluate
- /// to true.
- bool isNecessaryCond(Value *Cond, ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
- const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
- bool Inverse);
-
- /// isNecessaryCondOperands - Test whether the condition described by Pred,
- /// LHS, and RHS is a necessary condition for the condition described by
- /// Pred, FoundLHS, and FoundRHS to evaluate to true.
- bool isNecessaryCondOperands(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
- const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
- const SCEV *FoundLHS, const SCEV *FoundRHS);
+ /// isImpliedCond - Test whether the condition described by Pred, LHS,
+ /// and RHS is true whenever the given Cond value evaluates to true.
+ bool isImpliedCond(Value *Cond, ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
+ bool Inverse);
+
+ /// isImpliedCondOperands - Test whether the condition described by Pred,
+ /// LHS, and RHS is true whenever the condition desribed by Pred, FoundLHS,
+ /// and FoundRHS is true.
+ bool isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
+ const SCEV *FoundLHS, const SCEV *FoundRHS);
+
+ /// isImpliedCondOperandsHelper - Test whether the condition described by
+ /// Pred, LHS, and RHS is true whenever the condition desribed by Pred,
+ /// FoundLHS, and FoundRHS is true.
+ bool isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
+ const SCEV *FoundLHS, const SCEV *FoundRHS);
/// getConstantEvolutionLoopExitValue - If we know that the specified Phi is
/// in the header of its containing loop, we know the loop executes a
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index 20b2aa48c1..62b2032107 100644
--- a/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -4358,9 +4358,8 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
LoopContinuePredicate->isUnconditional())
return false;
- return
- isNecessaryCond(LoopContinuePredicate->getCondition(), Pred, LHS, RHS,
- LoopContinuePredicate->getSuccessor(0) != L->getHeader());
+ return isImpliedCond(LoopContinuePredicate->getCondition(), Pred, LHS, RHS,
+ LoopContinuePredicate->getSuccessor(0) != L->getHeader());
}
/// isLoopGuardedByCond - Test whether entry to the loop is protected
@@ -4390,122 +4389,55 @@ ScalarEvolution::isLoopGuardedByCond(const Loop *L,
LoopEntryPredicate->isUnconditional())
continue;
- if (isNecessaryCond(LoopEntryPredicate->getCondition(), Pred, LHS, RHS,
- LoopEntryPredicate->getSuccessor(0) != PredecessorDest))
+ if (isImpliedCond(LoopEntryPredicate->getCondition(), Pred, LHS, RHS,
+ LoopEntryPredicate->getSuccessor(0) != PredecessorDest))
return true;
}
return false;
}
-/// isNecessaryCond - Test whether the condition described by Pred, LHS,
-/// and RHS is a necessary condition for the given Cond value to evaluate
-/// to true.
-bool ScalarEvolution::isNecessaryCond(Value *CondValue,
- ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
- const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
- bool Inverse) {
+/// isImpliedCond - Test whether the condition described by Pred, LHS,
+/// and RHS is true whenever the given Cond value evaluates to true.
+bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCond(Value *CondValue,
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
+ bool Inverse) {
// Recursivly handle And and Or conditions.
if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(CondValue)) {
if (BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::And) {
if (!Inverse)
- return isNecessaryCond(BO->getOperand(0), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse) ||
- isNecessaryCond(BO->getOperand(1), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse);
+ return isImpliedCond(BO->getOperand(0), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse) ||
+ isImpliedCond(BO->getOperand(1), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse);
} else if (BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or) {
if (Inverse)
- return isNecessaryCond(BO->getOperand(0), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse) ||
- isNecessaryCond(BO->getOperand(1), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse);
+ return isImpliedCond(BO->getOperand(0), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse) ||
+ isImpliedCond(BO->getOperand(1), Pred, LHS, RHS, Inverse);
}
}
ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(CondValue);
if (!ICI) return false;
- // Now that we found a conditional branch that dominates the loop, check to
- // see if it is the comparison we are looking for.
- Value *PreCondLHS = ICI->getOperand(0);
- Value *PreCondRHS = ICI->getOperand(1);
- ICmpInst::Predicate FoundPred;
- if (Inverse)
- FoundPred = ICI->getInversePredicate();
- else
- FoundPred = ICI->getPredicate();
-
- if (FoundPred == Pred)
- ; // An exact match.
- else if (!ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(FoundPred) && Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE) {
- // The actual condition is beyond sufficient.
- FoundPred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
- // NE is symmetric but the original comparison may not be. Swap
- // the operands if necessary so that they match below.
- if (isa<SCEVConstant>(LHS))
- std::swap(PreCondLHS, PreCondRHS);
- } else
- // Check a few special cases.
- switch (FoundPred) {
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
- if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT) {
- std::swap(PreCondLHS, PreCondRHS);
- FoundPred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
- break;
- }
- return false;
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
- if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT) {
- std::swap(PreCondLHS, PreCondRHS);
- FoundPred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT;
- break;
- }
- return false;
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
- // Expressions like (x >u 0) are often canonicalized to (x != 0),
- // so check for this case by checking if the NE is comparing against
- // a minimum or maximum constant.
- if (!ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred))
- if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS)) {
- const APInt &A = C->getValue()->getValue();
- switch (Pred) {
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
- if (A.isMaxSignedValue()) break;
- return false;
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
- if (A.isMinSignedValue()) break;
- return false;
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
- if (A.isMaxValue()) break;
- return false;
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
- if (A.isMinValue()) break;
- return false;
- default:
- return false;
- }
- FoundPred = Pred;
- // NE is symmetric but the original comparison may not be. Swap
- // the operands if necessary so that they match below.
- if (isa<SCEVConstant>(LHS))
- std::swap(PreCondLHS, PreCondRHS);
- break;
- }
- return false;
- default:
- // We weren't able to reconcile the condition.
- return false;
- }
-
- assert(Pred == FoundPred && "Conditions were not reconciled!");
-
// Bail if the ICmp's operands' types are wider than the needed type
// before attempting to call getSCEV on them. This avoids infinite
// recursion, since the analysis of widening casts can require loop
// exit condition information for overflow checking, which would
// lead back here.
if (getTypeSizeInBits(LHS->getType()) <
- getTypeSizeInBits(PreCondLHS->getType()))
+ getTypeSizeInBits(ICI->getOperand(0)->getType()))
return false;
- const SCEV *FoundLHS = getSCEV(PreCondLHS);
- const SCEV *FoundRHS = getSCEV(PreCondRHS);
+ // Now that we found a conditional branch that dominates the loop, check to
+ // see if it is the comparison we are looking for.
+ ICmpInst::Predicate FoundPred;
+ if (Inverse)
+ FoundPred = ICI->getInversePredicate();
+ else
+ FoundPred = ICI->getPredicate();
+
+ const SCEV *FoundLHS = getSCEV(ICI->getOperand(0));
+ const SCEV *FoundRHS = getSCEV(ICI->getOperand(1));
// Balance the types. The case where FoundLHS' type is wider than
// LHS' type is checked for above.
@@ -4520,21 +4452,182 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isNecessaryCond(Value *CondValue,
}
}
- return isNecessaryCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS,
- FoundLHS, FoundRHS) ||
+ // Canonicalize the query to match the way instcombine will have
+ // canonicalized the comparison.
+ // First, put a constant operand on the right.
+ if (isa<SCEVConstant>(LHS)) {
+ std::swap(LHS, RHS);
+ Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
+ }
+ // Then, canonicalize comparisons with boundary cases.
+ if (const SCEVConstant *RC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS)) {
+ const APInt &RA = RC->getValue()->getValue();
+ switch (Pred) {
+ default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected ICmpInst::Predicate value!");
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
+ if ((RA - 1).isMinValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA - 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMaxValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMinValue()) return true;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
+ if ((RA + 1).isMaxValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA + 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMinValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMaxValue()) return true;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
+ if ((RA - 1).isMinSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA - 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMaxSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMinSignedValue()) return true;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
+ if ((RA + 1).isMaxSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA + 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMinSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMaxSignedValue()) return true;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
+ if (RA.isMinValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ break;
+ }
+ if ((RA + 1).isMaxValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA + 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMaxValue()) return false;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
+ if (RA.isMaxValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ break;
+ }
+ if ((RA - 1).isMinValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA - 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMinValue()) return false;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
+ if (RA.isMinSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ break;
+ }
+ if ((RA + 1).isMaxSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA + 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMaxSignedValue()) return false;
+ break;
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
+ if (RA.isMaxSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ break;
+ }
+ if ((RA - 1).isMinSignedValue()) {
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ RHS = getConstant(RA - 1);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (RA.isMinSignedValue()) return false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Check to see if we can make the LHS or RHS match.
+ if (LHS == FoundRHS || RHS == FoundLHS) {
+ if (isa<SCEVConstant>(RHS)) {
+ std::swap(FoundLHS, FoundRHS);
+ FoundPred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(FoundPred);
+ } else {
+ std::swap(LHS, RHS);
+ Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Check whether the found predicate is the same as the desired predicate.
+ if (FoundPred == Pred)
+ return isImpliedCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS);
+
+ // Check whether swapping the found predicate makes it the same as the
+ // desired predicate.
+ if (ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(FoundPred) == Pred) {
+ if (isa<SCEVConstant>(RHS))
+ return isImpliedCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS, FoundRHS, FoundLHS);
+ else
+ return isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred),
+ RHS, LHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS);
+ }
+
+ // Check whether the actual condition is beyond sufficient.
+ if (FoundPred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
+ if (ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred))
+ if (isImpliedCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS))
+ return true;
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
+ if (!ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(FoundPred))
+ if (isImpliedCondOperands(FoundPred, LHS, RHS, FoundLHS, FoundRHS))
+ return true;
+
+ // Otherwise assume the worst.
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// isImpliedCondOperands - Test whether the condition described by Pred,
+/// LHS, and RHS is true whenever the condition desribed by Pred, FoundLHS,
+/// and FoundRHS is true.
+bool ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperands(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
+ const SCEV *FoundLHS,
+ const SCEV *FoundRHS) {
+ return isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(Pred, LHS, RHS,
+ FoundLHS, FoundRHS) ||
// ~x < ~y --> x > y
- isNecessaryCondOperands(Pred, LHS, RHS,
- getNotSCEV(FoundRHS), getNotSCEV(FoundLHS));
+ isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(Pred, LHS, RHS,
+ getNotSCEV(FoundRHS),
+ getNotSCEV(FoundLHS));
}
-/// isNecessaryCondOperands - Test whether the condition described by Pred,
-/// LHS, and RHS is a necessary condition for the condition described by
-/// Pred, FoundLHS, and FoundRHS to evaluate to true.
+/// isImpliedCondOperandsHelper - Test whether the condition described by
+/// Pred, LHS, and RHS is true whenever the condition desribed by Pred,
+/// FoundLHS, and FoundRHS is true.
bool
-ScalarEvolution::isNecessaryCondOperands(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
- const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
- const SCEV *FoundLHS,
- const SCEV *FoundRHS) {
+ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsHelper(ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
+ const SCEV *FoundLHS,
+ const SCEV *FoundRHS) {
switch (Pred) {
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected ICmpInst::Predicate value!");
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
diff --git a/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count8.ll b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count8.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..21ccc47b8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/trip-count8.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -analyze -scalar-evolution -disable-output \
+; RUN: | grep {Loop for\\.body: backedge-taken count is (-1 + \[%\]ecx)}
+; PR4599
+
+target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128"
+
+define i32 @foo(i32 %ecx) nounwind {
+entry:
+ %cmp2 = icmp eq i32 %ecx, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %cmp2, label %for.end, label %bb.nph
+
+for.cond: ; preds = %for.inc
+ %cmp = icmp ult i32 %inc, %ecx ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge
+
+for.cond.for.end_crit_edge: ; preds = %for.cond
+ %phitmp = add i32 %i.01, 2 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br label %for.end
+
+bb.nph: ; preds = %entry
+ br label %for.body
+
+for.body: ; preds = %bb.nph, %for.cond
+ %i.01 = phi i32 [ %inc, %for.cond ], [ 0, %bb.nph ] ; <i32> [#uses=3]
+ %call = call i32 @bar(i32 %i.01) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0]
+ br label %for.inc
+
+for.inc: ; preds = %for.body
+ %inc = add i32 %i.01, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ br label %for.cond
+
+for.end: ; preds = %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge, %entry
+ %i.0.lcssa = phi i32 [ %phitmp, %for.cond.for.end_crit_edge ], [ 1, %entry ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %i.0.lcssa
+}
+
+declare i32 @bar(i32)