aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2009-10-20 16:22:37 +0000
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2009-10-20 16:22:37 +0000
commit1a49295eae19cb70b451d513aceddc12ba6aaa61 (patch)
tree9797447e5cd82942ba80655dd981393ae8451bd4 /lib
parentf993327e71d826dcb852929a78881569ef83374d (diff)
Make TranslateX86CC return COND_INVALID instead of aborting when it
encounters an OEQ or UNE comparison, and update its callers to check for this return status and recover. This fixes a problem resulting from the LowerOperation hooks being called from LegalizeVectorOps, because LegalizeVectorOps only lowers vectors, so OEQ and UNE comparisons may still be at large. This fixes PR5092. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@84640 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp19
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 74d9baec33..e5e7bc8bb7 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -2286,6 +2286,8 @@ static unsigned TranslateX86CC(ISD::CondCode SetCCOpcode, bool isFP,
case ISD::SETNE: return X86::COND_NE;
case ISD::SETUO: return X86::COND_P;
case ISD::SETO: return X86::COND_NP;
+ case ISD::SETOEQ:
+ case ISD::SETUNE: return X86::COND_INVALID;
}
}
@@ -5566,6 +5568,8 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSETCC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
bool isFP = Op.getOperand(1).getValueType().isFloatingPoint();
unsigned X86CC = TranslateX86CC(CC, isFP, Op0, Op1, DAG);
+ if (X86CC == X86::COND_INVALID)
+ return SDValue();
SDValue Cond = EmitCmp(Op0, Op1, X86CC, DAG);
return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SETCC, dl, MVT::i8,
@@ -5714,8 +5718,11 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
DebugLoc dl = Op.getDebugLoc();
SDValue CC;
- if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC)
- Cond = LowerSETCC(Cond, DAG);
+ if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
+ SDValue NewCond = LowerSETCC(Cond, DAG);
+ if (NewCond.getNode())
+ Cond = NewCond;
+ }
// If condition flag is set by a X86ISD::CMP, then use it as the condition
// setting operand in place of the X86ISD::SETCC.
@@ -5788,8 +5795,11 @@ SDValue X86TargetLowering::LowerBRCOND(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
DebugLoc dl = Op.getDebugLoc();
SDValue CC;
- if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC)
- Cond = LowerSETCC(Cond, DAG);
+ if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
+ SDValue NewCond = LowerSETCC(Cond, DAG);
+ if (NewCond.getNode())
+ Cond = NewCond;
+ }
#if 0
// FIXME: LowerXALUO doesn't handle these!!
else if (Cond.getOpcode() == X86ISD::ADD ||
@@ -6338,6 +6348,7 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerINTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
SDValue LHS = Op.getOperand(1);
SDValue RHS = Op.getOperand(2);
unsigned X86CC = TranslateX86CC(CC, true, LHS, RHS, DAG);
+ assert(X86CC != X86::COND_INVALID && "Unexpected illegal condition!");
SDValue Cond = DAG.getNode(Opc, dl, MVT::i32, LHS, RHS);
SDValue SetCC = DAG.getNode(X86ISD::SETCC, dl, MVT::i8,
DAG.getConstant(X86CC, MVT::i8), Cond);