aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2009-12-18 01:24:09 +0000
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2009-12-18 01:24:09 +0000
commit92329c7fbe572892c17aa2d2542a10e3ea16132f (patch)
treece133aeb6883b2cb097896877b881cbb1340287a /lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
parent3ca735450db584068f07b728f0537c3e9208a699 (diff)
Add Loop contains utility methods for testing whether a loop
contains another loop, or an instruction. The loop form is substantially more efficient on large loops than the typical code it replaces. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@91654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp26
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
index 0601423f8c..662b9d08ae 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEV *NewBase,
// If this is a use outside the loop (which means after, since it is based
// on a loop indvar) we use the post-incremented value, so that we don't
// artificially make the preinc value live out the bottom of the loop.
- if (!isUseOfPostIncrementedValue && L->contains(Inst->getParent())) {
+ if (!isUseOfPostIncrementedValue && L->contains(Inst)) {
if (NewBasePt && isa<PHINode>(OperandValToReplace)) {
InsertPt = NewBasePt;
++InsertPt;
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEV *NewBase,
// that case(?).
Instruction *OldLoc = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace);
BasicBlock *PHIPred = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
- if (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) {
+ if (L->contains(OldLoc)) {
// If this is a critical edge, split the edge so that we do not insert
// the code on all predecessor/successor paths. We do this unless this
// is the canonical backedge for this loop, as this can make some
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEV *NewBase,
// is outside of the loop, and PredTI is in the loop, we want to
// move the block to be immediately before the PHI block, not
// immediately after PredTI.
- if (L->contains(PHIPred) && !L->contains(PN->getParent()))
+ if (L->contains(PHIPred) && !L->contains(PN))
NewBB->moveBefore(PN->getParent());
// Splitting the edge can reduce the number of PHI entries we have.
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEV *NewBase,
Value *&Code = InsertedCode[PHIPred];
if (!Code) {
// Insert the code into the end of the predecessor block.
- Instruction *InsertPt = (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) ?
+ Instruction *InsertPt = (L->contains(OldLoc)) ?
PHIPred->getTerminator() :
OldLoc->getParent()->getTerminator();
Code = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase, PN->getType(),
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
// it is clearly shared across all the IV's. If the use is outside the loop
// (which means after it) we don't want to factor anything *into* the loop,
// so just use 0 as the base.
- if (L->contains(Uses[0].Inst->getParent()))
+ if (L->contains(Uses[0].Inst))
std::swap(Result, Uses[0].Base);
return Result;
}
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
// after the loop to affect base computation of values *inside* the loop,
// because we can always add their offsets to the result IV after the loop
// is done, ensuring we get good code inside the loop.
- if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
+ if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst))
continue;
NumUsesInsideLoop++;
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
// and a Result in the same instruction (for example because it would
// require too many registers). Check this.
for (unsigned i=0; i<NumUses; ++i) {
- if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
+ if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst))
continue;
// We know this is an addressing mode use; if there are any uses that
// are not, FreeResult would be Zero.
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
// the final IV value coming into those uses does. Instead of trying to
// remove the pieces of the common base, which might not be there,
// subtract off the base to compensate for this.
- if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent())) {
+ if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst)) {
Uses[i].Base = SE->getMinusSCEV(Uses[i].Base, Result);
continue;
}
@@ -1109,7 +1109,7 @@ const SCEV *LoopStrengthReduce::CollectIVUsers(const SCEV *Stride,
// If the user is not in the current loop, this means it is using the exit
// value of the IV. Do not put anything in the base, make sure it's all in
// the immediate field to allow as much factoring as possible.
- if (!L->contains(UsersToProcess[i].Inst->getParent())) {
+ if (!L->contains(UsersToProcess[i].Inst)) {
UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm,
UsersToProcess[i].Base);
UsersToProcess[i].Base =
@@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static Instruction *FindIVIncInsertPt(std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
const Loop *L) {
if (UsersToProcess.size() == 1 &&
UsersToProcess[0].isUseOfPostIncrementedValue &&
- L->contains(UsersToProcess[0].Inst->getParent()))
+ L->contains(UsersToProcess[0].Inst))
return UsersToProcess[0].Inst;
return L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();
}
@@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ LoopStrengthReduce::StrengthReduceIVUsersOfStride(const SCEV *Stride,
// loop to ensure it is dominated by the increment. In case it's the
// only use of the iv, the increment instruction is already before the
// use.
- if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()) && User.Inst != IVIncInsertPt)
+ if (L->contains(User.Inst) && User.Inst != IVIncInsertPt)
User.Inst->moveBefore(IVIncInsertPt);
}
@@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ LoopStrengthReduce::StrengthReduceIVUsersOfStride(const SCEV *Stride,
// common base, and are adding it back here. Use the same expression
// as before, rather than CommonBaseV, so DAGCombiner will zap it.
if (!CommonExprs->isZero()) {
- if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()))
+ if (L->contains(User.Inst))
RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr,
SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV));
else
@@ -2363,7 +2363,7 @@ static bool isUsedByExitBranch(ICmpInst *Cond, Loop *L) {
static bool ShouldCountToZero(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *L,
const TargetLowering *TLI = 0) {
- if (!L->contains(Cond->getParent()))
+ if (!L->contains(Cond))
return false;
if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->getOffset()))