Instead of hacking in custom support for Invoke/Unwind, use the LowerInvoke pass

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@8871 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index d511de6721..dcc9beaf9d 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ bool X86TargetMachine::addPassesToEmitAssembly(PassManager &PM,
   // FIXME: Implement the switch instruction in the instruction selector!
   PM.add(createLowerSwitchPass());
 
+  // FIXME: Implement the invoke/unwind instructions!
+  PM.add(createLowerInvokePass());
+
+  // FIXME: The code generator does not properly handle functions with
+  // unreachable basic blocks.
+  PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
+
   if (NoPatternISel)
     PM.add(createX86SimpleInstructionSelector(*this));
   else
@@ -94,6 +101,13 @@ bool X86TargetMachine::addPassesToJITCompile(FunctionPassManager &PM) {
   // FIXME: Implement the switch instruction in the instruction selector!
   PM.add(createLowerSwitchPass());
 
+  // FIXME: Implement the invoke/unwind instructions!
+  PM.add(createLowerInvokePass());
+
+  // FIXME: The code generator does not properly handle functions with
+  // unreachable basic blocks.
+  PM.add(createCFGSimplificationPass());
+
   if (NoPatternISel)
     PM.add(createX86SimpleInstructionSelector(*this));
   else