Change allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses to take type argument since some targets

support unaligned mem access only for certain types. (Should it be size
instead?)

ARM v7 supports unaligned access for i16 and i32, some v6 variants support it
as well.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@79127 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
index 9de737be99..99135b2311 100644
--- a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
@@ -3121,6 +3121,27 @@ SDValue ARMTargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine(SDNode *N,
   return SDValue();
 }
 
+bool ARMTargetLowering::allowsUnalignedMemoryAccesses(EVT VT) const {
+  if (!Subtarget->hasV6Ops())
+    // Pre-v6 does not support unaligned mem access.
+    return false;
+  else if (!Subtarget->hasV6Ops()) {
+    // v6 may or may not support unaligned mem access.
+    if (!Subtarget->isTargetDarwin())
+      return false;
+  }
+
+  switch (VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy) {
+  default:
+    return false;
+  case MVT::i8:
+  case MVT::i16:
+  case MVT::i32:
+    return true;
+  // FIXME: VLD1 etc with standard alignment is legal.
+  }
+}
+
 static bool isLegalT1AddressImmediate(int64_t V, EVT VT) {
   if (V < 0)
     return false;