aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/CodeGen
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2008-11-10 17:28:30 +0000
committerDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2008-11-10 17:28:30 +0000
commita29c13086a3add78a3a79f744573fe09eaa9dc88 (patch)
tree2cfcdeb4398e87584b879bb62bc37ce65e0a740e /lib/CodeGen
parentc04b6917c184ca9d6c7bc0c749a734f89cebcd35 (diff)
When promoting the result of fp_to_uint/fp_to_sint,
inform the optimizers that the result must be zero/ sign extended from the smaller type. For example, if a fp to unsigned i16 is promoted to fp to i32, then we are allowed to assume that the extra 16 bits are zero (because the result of fp to i16 is undefined if the result does not fit in an i16). This is quite aggressive, but should help the optimizers produce better code. This requires correcting a test which thought that fp_to_uint is some kind of truncation, which it is not: in the testcase (which does fp to i1), either the fp value converts to 0 or 1 or the result is undefined, which is quite different to truncation. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp25
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
index 9bd8bb521b..a4be03a844 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_Constant(SDNode *N) {
// matter in theory which one we pick, but this tends to give better code?
unsigned Opc = VT.isByteSized() ? ISD::SIGN_EXTEND : ISD::ZERO_EXTEND;
SDValue Result = DAG.getNode(Opc, TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(VT),
- SDValue(N, 0));
+ SDValue(N, 0));
assert(isa<ConstantSDNode>(Result) && "Didn't constant fold ext?");
return Result;
}
@@ -350,22 +350,27 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(SDNode *N) {
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_FP_TO_XINT(SDNode *N) {
- unsigned NewOpc = N->getOpcode();
MVT NVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(N->getValueType(0));
+ unsigned NewOpc = N->getOpcode();
// If we're promoting a UINT to a larger size, check to see if the new node
// will be legal. If it isn't, check to see if FP_TO_SINT is legal, since
// we can use that instead. This allows us to generate better code for
// FP_TO_UINT for small destination sizes on targets where FP_TO_UINT is not
// legal, such as PowerPC.
- if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::FP_TO_UINT) {
- if (!TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, NVT) &&
- (TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, NVT) ||
- TLI.getOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, NVT)==TargetLowering::Custom))
- NewOpc = ISD::FP_TO_SINT;
- }
-
- return DAG.getNode(NewOpc, NVT, N->getOperand(0));
+ if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::FP_TO_UINT &&
+ !TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::FP_TO_UINT, NVT) &&
+ TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, NVT))
+ NewOpc = ISD::FP_TO_SINT;
+
+ SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(NewOpc, NVT, N->getOperand(0));
+
+ // Assert that the converted value fits in the original type. If it doesn't
+ // (eg: because the value being converted is too big), then the result of the
+ // original operation was undefined anyway, so the assert is still correct.
+ return DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode() == ISD::FP_TO_UINT ?
+ ISD::AssertZext : ISD::AssertSext,
+ NVT, Res, DAG.getValueType(N->getValueType(0)));
}
SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_INT_EXTEND(SDNode *N) {