diff options
author | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2008-02-13 18:01:53 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2008-02-13 18:01:53 +0000 |
commit | d462ba853981d45bf9c777564e79dc9e1c850ca6 (patch) | |
tree | 7c160428925fb88c8e140a63491831477f3d02e2 /lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp | |
parent | 82f0a09c1036c8651f0aa01d1f635abf9460d9f8 (diff) |
Teach LegalizeTypes how to expand and promote CTLZ,
CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from
that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the
CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on
whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether
CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the
width of the type is) for it. I made this change
because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo
is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for
CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it
uses an "or" to get the right result when the
original value is zero, rather than using a compare
and select. This also means the value doesn't
need to be zero extended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47075 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp | 35 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp index 19d9d5bb62..3dab01a981 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp @@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteResult(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) { case ISD::SELECT: Result = PromoteResult_SELECT(N); break; case ISD::SELECT_CC: Result = PromoteResult_SELECT_CC(N); break; + case ISD::CTLZ: Result = PromoteResult_CTLZ(N); break; + case ISD::CTPOP: Result = PromoteResult_CTPOP(N); break; + case ISD::CTTZ: Result = PromoteResult_CTTZ(N); break; } // If Result is null, the sub-method took care of registering the result. @@ -265,6 +268,38 @@ SDOperand DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteResult_SELECT_CC(SDNode *N) { N->getOperand(1), LHS, RHS, N->getOperand(4)); } +SDOperand DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteResult_CTLZ(SDNode *N) { + SDOperand Op = GetPromotedOp(N->getOperand(0)); + MVT::ValueType OVT = N->getValueType(0); + MVT::ValueType NVT = Op.getValueType(); + // Zero extend to the promoted type and do the count there. + Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTLZ, NVT, DAG.getZeroExtendInReg(Op, OVT)); + // Subtract off the extra leading bits in the bigger type. + return DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, NVT, Op, + DAG.getConstant(MVT::getSizeInBits(NVT) - + MVT::getSizeInBits(OVT), NVT)); +} + +SDOperand DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteResult_CTPOP(SDNode *N) { + SDOperand Op = GetPromotedOp(N->getOperand(0)); + MVT::ValueType OVT = N->getValueType(0); + MVT::ValueType NVT = Op.getValueType(); + // Zero extend to the promoted type and do the count there. + return DAG.getNode(ISD::CTPOP, NVT, DAG.getZeroExtendInReg(Op, OVT)); +} + +SDOperand DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteResult_CTTZ(SDNode *N) { + SDOperand Op = GetPromotedOp(N->getOperand(0)); + MVT::ValueType OVT = N->getValueType(0); + MVT::ValueType NVT = Op.getValueType(); + // The count is the same in the promoted type except if the original + // value was zero. This can be handled by setting the bit just off + // the top of the original type. + Op = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, NVT, Op, + // FIXME: Do this using an APINT constant. + DAG.getConstant(1UL << MVT::getSizeInBits(OVT), NVT)); + return DAG.getNode(ISD::CTTZ, NVT, Op); +} //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // Operand Promotion |