aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2008-02-26 11:21:42 +0000
committerDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2008-02-26 11:21:42 +0000
commit212a11c417e272cc8fd12e66cfe5110c47559e17 (patch)
tree0238620a3d383a2c44cf96f4913892958190294f /lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp
parent85db3a96b49e4fdb130b55f27e1d5596e771795a (diff)
Fix a nasty bug in LegalizeTypes (spotted in
CodeGen/PowerPC/illegal-element-type.ll): suppose a node X is processed, and processing maps it to a node Y. Then X continues to exist in the DAG, but with no users. While processing some other node, a new node may be created that happens to be equal to X, and thus X will be reused rather than a truly new node. This can cause X to "magically reappear", and since it is in the Processed state in will not be reprocessed, so at the end of type legalization the illegal node X can still be present. The solution is to replace X with Y whenever X gets resurrected like this. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp15
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp
index 3d4ba7b500..2ff1693e89 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesPromote.cpp
@@ -368,11 +368,10 @@ bool DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
// Mark N as new and remark N and its operands. This allows us to correctly
// revisit N if it needs another step of promotion and allows us to visit
// any new operands to N.
- N->setNodeId(NewNode);
- MarkNewNodes(N);
+ ReanalyzeNode(N);
return true;
}
-
+
assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 &&
"Invalid operand expansion");
@@ -448,10 +447,8 @@ SDOperand DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteOperand_SELECT(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
// that the value is properly zero extended.
unsigned BitWidth = Cond.getValueSizeInBits();
if (!DAG.MaskedValueIsZero(Cond,
- APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-1))) {
+ APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-1)))
Cond = DAG.getZeroExtendInReg(Cond, MVT::i1);
- MarkNewNodes(Cond.Val);
- }
// The chain (Op#0) and basic block destination (Op#2) are always legal types.
return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDOperand(N, 0), Cond, N->getOperand(1),
@@ -466,11 +463,9 @@ SDOperand DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteOperand_BRCOND(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
// that the value is properly zero extended.
unsigned BitWidth = Cond.getValueSizeInBits();
if (!DAG.MaskedValueIsZero(Cond,
- APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-1))) {
+ APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-1)))
Cond = DAG.getZeroExtendInReg(Cond, MVT::i1);
- MarkNewNodes(Cond.Val);
- }
-
+
// The chain (Op#0) and basic block destination (Op#2) are always legal types.
return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDOperand(N, 0), N->getOperand(0), Cond,
N->getOperand(2));