diff options
author | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2008-10-29 06:42:19 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2008-10-29 06:42:19 +0000 |
commit | 23b10f5b64e594aa7c6b415805b563fed2a75874 (patch) | |
tree | ac2eb9290783cc8dade0d031612e8c568ad79562 /lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp | |
parent | b3bc6352defdf1a5c6b1b0770d0c4d603f6524a8 (diff) |
Fix a FIXME: in ReplaceNodeWith, if the new node
is morphed by AnalyzeNewNode into a previously
processed node, and different result values of
that node are remapped to values with different
nodes, then we could end up using wrong values
here [we were assuming that all results remap
to values with the same underlying node]. This
seems theoretically possible, but I don't have
a testcase. The meat of the patch is in the
changes to AnalyzeNewNode/AnalyzeNewValue and
ReplaceNodeWith. While there, I changed names
like RemapNode to RemapValue, since it really
remaps values. To tell the truth, I would be
much happier if we were only remapping nodes
(it would simplify a bunch of logic, and allow
for some cute speedups) but I haven't yet worked
out how to do that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@58372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp | 173 |
1 files changed, 97 insertions, 76 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp index 553cd66d36..0461634b74 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.cpp @@ -220,14 +220,13 @@ NodeDone: /// AnalyzeNewNode - The specified node is the root of a subtree of potentially /// new nodes. Correct any processed operands (this may change the node) and -/// calculate the NodeId. +/// calculate the NodeId. If the node itself changes to a processed node, it +/// is not remapped - the caller needs to take care of this. /// Returns the potentially changed node. -void DAGTypeLegalizer::AnalyzeNewNode(SDValue &Val) { - SDNode *N = Val.getNode(); - +SDNode *DAGTypeLegalizer::AnalyzeNewNode(SDNode *N) { // If this was an existing node that is already done, we're done. if (N->getNodeId() != NewNode) - return; + return N; // Remove any stale map entries. ExpungeNode(N); @@ -250,9 +249,9 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::AnalyzeNewNode(SDValue &Val) { SDValue Op = OrigOp; if (Op.getNode()->getNodeId() == Processed) - RemapNode(Op); + RemapValue(Op); else if (Op.getNode()->getNodeId() == NewNode) - AnalyzeNewNode(Op); + AnalyzeNewValue(Op); if (Op.getNode()->getNodeId() == Processed) ++NumProcessed; @@ -270,21 +269,16 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::AnalyzeNewNode(SDValue &Val) { // Some operands changed - update the node. if (!NewOps.empty()) { - Val = DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(Val, &NewOps[0], NewOps.size()); - if (Val.getNode() != N) { - // The node morphed, work with the new node. - N = Val.getNode(); - - // Maybe it morphed into a previously analyzed node? - if (N->getNodeId() != NewNode) { - if (N->getNodeId() == Processed) - // An already processed node may need to be remapped. - RemapNode(Val); - return; - } + SDNode *M = DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDValue(N, 0), &NewOps[0], + NewOps.size()).getNode(); + if (M != N) { + if (M->getNodeId() != NewNode) + // It morphed into a previously analyzed node - nothing more to do. + return M; // It morphed into a different new node. Do the equivalent of passing // it to AnalyzeNewNode: expunge it and calculate the NodeId. + N = M; ExpungeNode(N); } } @@ -293,6 +287,23 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::AnalyzeNewNode(SDValue &Val) { N->setNodeId(N->getNumOperands()-NumProcessed); if (N->getNodeId() == ReadyToProcess) Worklist.push_back(N); + + return N; +} + +/// AnalyzeNewValue - Call AnalyzeNewNode, updating the node in Val if needed. +/// If the node changes to a processed node, then remap it. +void DAGTypeLegalizer::AnalyzeNewValue(SDValue &Val) { + SDNode *N(Val.getNode()); + // If this was an existing node that is already done, avoid remapping it. + if (N->getNodeId() != NewNode) + return; + SDNode *M(AnalyzeNewNode(N)); + if (M != N) + Val.setNode(M); + if (M->getNodeId() == Processed) + // It morphed into an already processed node - remap it. + RemapValue(Val); } @@ -310,7 +321,7 @@ namespace { N->getNodeId() != DAGTypeLegalizer::ReadyToProcess && "RAUW deleted processed node!"); // It is possible, though rare, for the deleted node N to occur as a - // target in a map, so note the replacement N -> E in ReplacedNodes. + // target in a map, so note the replacement N -> E in ReplacedValues. assert(E && "Node not replaced?"); DTL.NoteDeletion(N, E); } @@ -336,7 +347,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ReplaceValueWith(SDValue From, SDValue To) { // If expansion produced new nodes, make sure they are properly marked. ExpungeNode(From.getNode()); - AnalyzeNewNode(To); // Expunges To. + AnalyzeNewValue(To); // Expunges To. // Anything that used the old node should now use the new one. Note that this // can potentially cause recursive merging. @@ -345,7 +356,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ReplaceValueWith(SDValue From, SDValue To) { // The old node may still be present in a map like ExpandedIntegers or // PromotedIntegers. Inform maps about the replacement. - ReplacedNodes[From] = To; + ReplacedValues[From] = To; } /// ReplaceNodeWith - Replace uses of the 'from' node's results with the 'to' @@ -356,9 +367,9 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ReplaceNodeWith(SDNode *From, SDNode *To) { // If expansion produced new nodes, make sure they are properly marked. ExpungeNode(From); - SDValue Val(To, 0); - AnalyzeNewNode(Val); // Expunges To. FIXME: All results mapped the same? - To = Val.getNode(); + To = AnalyzeNewNode(To); // Expunges To. + // If To morphed into an already processed node, its values may need + // remapping. This is done below. assert(From->getNumValues() == To->getNumValues() && "Node results don't match"); @@ -366,51 +377,61 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ReplaceNodeWith(SDNode *From, SDNode *To) { // Anything that used the old node should now use the new one. Note that this // can potentially cause recursive merging. NodeUpdateListener NUL(*this); - DAG.ReplaceAllUsesWith(From, To, &NUL); - - // The old node may still be present in a map like ExpandedIntegers or - // PromotedIntegers. Inform maps about the replacement. for (unsigned i = 0, e = From->getNumValues(); i != e; ++i) { - assert(From->getValueType(i) == To->getValueType(i) && - "Node results don't match"); - ReplacedNodes[SDValue(From, i)] = SDValue(To, i); + SDValue FromVal(From, i); + SDValue ToVal(To, i); + + // AnalyzeNewNode may have morphed a new node into a processed node. Remap + // values now. + if (To->getNodeId() == Processed) + RemapValue(ToVal); + + assert(FromVal.getValueType() == ToVal.getValueType() && + "Node results don't match!"); + + // Make anything that used the old value use the new value. + DAG.ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith(FromVal, ToVal, &NUL); + + // The old node may still be present in a map like ExpandedIntegers or + // PromotedIntegers. Inform maps about the replacement. + ReplacedValues[FromVal] = ToVal; } } -/// RemapNode - If the specified value was already legalized to another value, +/// RemapValue - If the specified value was already legalized to another value, /// replace it by that value. -void DAGTypeLegalizer::RemapNode(SDValue &N) { - DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = ReplacedNodes.find(N); - if (I != ReplacedNodes.end()) { +void DAGTypeLegalizer::RemapValue(SDValue &N) { + DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = ReplacedValues.find(N); + if (I != ReplacedValues.end()) { // Use path compression to speed up future lookups if values get multiply // replaced with other values. - RemapNode(I->second); + RemapValue(I->second); N = I->second; } assert(N.getNode()->getNodeId() != NewNode && "Mapped to unanalyzed node!"); } -/// ExpungeNode - If N has a bogus mapping in ReplacedNodes, eliminate it. +/// ExpungeNode - If N has a bogus mapping in ReplacedValues, eliminate it. /// This can occur when a node is deleted then reallocated as a new node - -/// the mapping in ReplacedNodes applies to the deleted node, not the new +/// the mapping in ReplacedValues applies to the deleted node, not the new /// one. -/// The only map that can have a deleted node as a source is ReplacedNodes. +/// The only map that can have a deleted node as a source is ReplacedValues. /// Other maps can have deleted nodes as targets, but since their looked-up -/// values are always immediately remapped using RemapNode, resulting in a -/// not-deleted node, this is harmless as long as ReplacedNodes/RemapNode +/// values are always immediately remapped using RemapValue, resulting in a +/// not-deleted node, this is harmless as long as ReplacedValues/RemapValue /// always performs correct mappings. In order to keep the mapping correct, /// ExpungeNode should be called on any new nodes *before* adding them as -/// either source or target to ReplacedNodes (which typically means calling +/// either source or target to ReplacedValues (which typically means calling /// Expunge when a new node is first seen, since it may no longer be marked -/// NewNode by the time it is added to ReplacedNodes). +/// NewNode by the time it is added to ReplacedValues). void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpungeNode(SDNode *N) { if (N->getNodeId() != NewNode) return; - // If N is not remapped by ReplacedNodes then there is nothing to do. + // If N is not remapped by ReplacedValues then there is nothing to do. unsigned i, e; for (i = 0, e = N->getNumValues(); i != e; ++i) - if (ReplacedNodes.find(SDValue(N, i)) != ReplacedNodes.end()) + if (ReplacedValues.find(SDValue(N, i)) != ReplacedValues.end()) break; if (i == e) @@ -421,52 +442,52 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpungeNode(SDNode *N) { for (DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = PromotedIntegers.begin(), E = PromotedIntegers.end(); I != E; ++I) { assert(I->first.getNode() != N); - RemapNode(I->second); + RemapValue(I->second); } for (DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = SoftenedFloats.begin(), E = SoftenedFloats.end(); I != E; ++I) { assert(I->first.getNode() != N); - RemapNode(I->second); + RemapValue(I->second); } for (DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = ScalarizedVectors.begin(), E = ScalarizedVectors.end(); I != E; ++I) { assert(I->first.getNode() != N); - RemapNode(I->second); + RemapValue(I->second); } for (DenseMap<SDValue, std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> >::iterator I = ExpandedIntegers.begin(), E = ExpandedIntegers.end(); I != E; ++I){ assert(I->first.getNode() != N); - RemapNode(I->second.first); - RemapNode(I->second.second); + RemapValue(I->second.first); + RemapValue(I->second.second); } for (DenseMap<SDValue, std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> >::iterator I = ExpandedFloats.begin(), E = ExpandedFloats.end(); I != E; ++I) { assert(I->first.getNode() != N); - RemapNode(I->second.first); - RemapNode(I->second.second); + RemapValue(I->second.first); + RemapValue(I->second.second); } for (DenseMap<SDValue, std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> >::iterator I = SplitVectors.begin(), E = SplitVectors.end(); I != E; ++I) { assert(I->first.getNode() != N); - RemapNode(I->second.first); - RemapNode(I->second.second); + RemapValue(I->second.first); + RemapValue(I->second.second); } - for (DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = ReplacedNodes.begin(), - E = ReplacedNodes.end(); I != E; ++I) - RemapNode(I->second); + for (DenseMap<SDValue, SDValue>::iterator I = ReplacedValues.begin(), + E = ReplacedValues.end(); I != E; ++I) + RemapValue(I->second); for (unsigned i = 0, e = N->getNumValues(); i != e; ++i) - ReplacedNodes.erase(SDValue(N, i)); + ReplacedValues.erase(SDValue(N, i)); } void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetPromotedInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue Result) { - AnalyzeNewNode(Result); + AnalyzeNewValue(Result); SDValue &OpEntry = PromotedIntegers[Op]; assert(OpEntry.getNode() == 0 && "Node is already promoted!"); @@ -474,7 +495,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetPromotedInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue Result) { } void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetSoftenedFloat(SDValue Op, SDValue Result) { - AnalyzeNewNode(Result); + AnalyzeNewValue(Result); SDValue &OpEntry = SoftenedFloats[Op]; assert(OpEntry.getNode() == 0 && "Node is already converted to integer!"); @@ -482,7 +503,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetSoftenedFloat(SDValue Op, SDValue Result) { } void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetScalarizedVector(SDValue Op, SDValue Result) { - AnalyzeNewNode(Result); + AnalyzeNewValue(Result); SDValue &OpEntry = ScalarizedVectors[Op]; assert(OpEntry.getNode() == 0 && "Node is already scalarized!"); @@ -492,8 +513,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetScalarizedVector(SDValue Op, SDValue Result) { void DAGTypeLegalizer::GetExpandedInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi) { std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> &Entry = ExpandedIntegers[Op]; - RemapNode(Entry.first); - RemapNode(Entry.second); + RemapValue(Entry.first); + RemapValue(Entry.second); assert(Entry.first.getNode() && "Operand isn't expanded"); Lo = Entry.first; Hi = Entry.second; @@ -502,8 +523,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::GetExpandedInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue Lo, SDValue Hi) { // Lo/Hi may have been newly allocated, if so, add nodeid's as relevant. - AnalyzeNewNode(Lo); - AnalyzeNewNode(Hi); + AnalyzeNewValue(Lo); + AnalyzeNewValue(Hi); // Remember that this is the result of the node. std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> &Entry = ExpandedIntegers[Op]; @@ -515,8 +536,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue Lo, void DAGTypeLegalizer::GetExpandedFloat(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi) { std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> &Entry = ExpandedFloats[Op]; - RemapNode(Entry.first); - RemapNode(Entry.second); + RemapValue(Entry.first); + RemapValue(Entry.second); assert(Entry.first.getNode() && "Operand isn't expanded"); Lo = Entry.first; Hi = Entry.second; @@ -525,8 +546,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::GetExpandedFloat(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedFloat(SDValue Op, SDValue Lo, SDValue Hi) { // Lo/Hi may have been newly allocated, if so, add nodeid's as relevant. - AnalyzeNewNode(Lo); - AnalyzeNewNode(Hi); + AnalyzeNewValue(Lo); + AnalyzeNewValue(Hi); // Remember that this is the result of the node. std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> &Entry = ExpandedFloats[Op]; @@ -538,8 +559,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedFloat(SDValue Op, SDValue Lo, void DAGTypeLegalizer::GetSplitVector(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi) { std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> &Entry = SplitVectors[Op]; - RemapNode(Entry.first); - RemapNode(Entry.second); + RemapValue(Entry.first); + RemapValue(Entry.second); assert(Entry.first.getNode() && "Operand isn't split"); Lo = Entry.first; Hi = Entry.second; @@ -548,8 +569,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::GetSplitVector(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, void DAGTypeLegalizer::SetSplitVector(SDValue Op, SDValue Lo, SDValue Hi) { // Lo/Hi may have been newly allocated, if so, add nodeid's as relevant. - AnalyzeNewNode(Lo); - AnalyzeNewNode(Hi); + AnalyzeNewValue(Lo); + AnalyzeNewValue(Hi); // Remember that this is the result of the node. std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> &Entry = SplitVectors[Op]; @@ -610,8 +631,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger(SDValue Op, Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, HiVT, Hi); } -/// SplitInteger - Return the lower and upper halves of Op's bits in a value type -/// half the size of Op's. +/// SplitInteger - Return the lower and upper halves of Op's bits in a value +/// type half the size of Op's. void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi) { MVT HalfVT = MVT::getIntegerVT(Op.getValueType().getSizeInBits()/2); |