diff options
author | Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com> | 2009-06-01 23:27:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com> | 2009-06-01 23:27:20 +0000 |
commit | 4150d83abe90a5da4ddf86433b7bf4329acfa57c (patch) | |
tree | f6d49f1a1eadb573ca9969173c76b891c035eb53 /lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp | |
parent | 83138998513faed0c1d31e712ac6e6d5e6ee8d91 (diff) |
Make the implicit inputs and outputs of target-independent
ADDC/ADDE use MVT::i1 (later, whatever it gets legalized to)
instead of MVT::Flag. Remove CARRY_FALSE in favor of 0; adjust
all target-independent code to use this format.
Most targets will still produce a Flag-setting target-dependent
version when selection is done. X86 is converted to use i32
instead, which means TableGen needs to produce different code
in xxxGenDAGISel.inc. This keys off the new supportsHasI1 bit
in xxxInstrInfo, currently set only for X86; in principle this
is temporary and should go away when all other targets have
been converted. All relevant X86 instruction patterns are
modified to represent setting and using EFLAGS explicitly. The
same can be done on other targets.
The immediate behavior change is that an ADC/ADD pair are no
longer tightly coupled in the X86 scheduler; they can be
separated by instructions that don't clobber the flags (MOV).
I will soon add some peephole optimizations based on using
other instructions that set the flags to feed into ADC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@72707 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp | 60 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp index eb9342cc8b..a8d8b7d9c7 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerResult(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) { case ISD::USUBO: Res = PromoteIntRes_UADDSUBO(N, ResNo); break; case ISD::SMULO: case ISD::UMULO: Res = PromoteIntRes_XMULO(N, ResNo); break; + case ISD::ADDC: + case ISD::SUBC: Res = PromoteIntRes_ADDSUBC(N, ResNo); break; + case ISD::ADDE: + case ISD::SUBE: Res = PromoteIntRes_ADDSUBE(N, ResNo); break; case ISD::ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD: case ISD::ATOMIC_LOAD_SUB: @@ -121,6 +125,35 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerResult(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) { SetPromotedInteger(SDValue(N, ResNo), Res); } +SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_ADDSUBC(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) { + // Only the carry bit result is expected to be promoted. + assert(ResNo == 1 && "Only carry bit result promotion currently supported!"); + return PromoteIntRes_Overflow(N); +} + +SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_ADDSUBE(SDNode *N, unsigned ResNo) { + // Only the carry bit result is expected to be promoted. + assert(ResNo == 1 && "Only carry bit result promotion currently supported!"); + // This is a ternary operator, so clone a slightly modified + // PromoteIntRes_Overflow here (this is the only client). + if (ResNo == 1) { + // Simply change the return type of the boolean result. + MVT NVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(N->getValueType(1)); + MVT ValueVTs[] = { N->getValueType(0), NVT }; + SDValue Ops[] = { N->getOperand(0), N->getOperand(1), N->getOperand(2) }; + SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), N->getDebugLoc(), + DAG.getVTList(ValueVTs, 2), Ops, 3); + + // Modified the sum result - switch anything that used the old sum to use + // the new one. + ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(N, 0), Res); + + return SDValue(Res.getNode(), 1); + } + assert(0 && "Do not know how to promote this operator!"); + abort(); +} + SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_AssertSext(SDNode *N) { // Sign-extend the new bits, and continue the assertion. SDValue Op = SExtPromotedInteger(N->getOperand(0)); @@ -419,7 +452,7 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_LOAD(LoadSDNode *N) { return Res; } -/// Promote the overflow flag of an overflowing arithmetic node. +/// Promote the overflow or carry result of an overflowing arithmetic node. SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_Overflow(SDNode *N) { // Simply change the return type of the boolean result. MVT NVT = TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(N->getValueType(1)); @@ -666,6 +699,8 @@ bool DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) { assert(0 && "Do not know how to promote this operator's operand!"); abort(); + case ISD::ADDE: + case ISD::SUBE: Res = PromoteIntOp_ADDSUBE(N, OpNo); break; case ISD::ANY_EXTEND: Res = PromoteIntOp_ANY_EXTEND(N); break; case ISD::BIT_CONVERT: Res = PromoteIntOp_BIT_CONVERT(N); break; case ISD::BR_CC: Res = PromoteIntOp_BR_CC(N, OpNo); break; @@ -743,6 +778,13 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteSetCCOperands(SDValue &NewLHS,SDValue &NewRHS, } } +SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_ADDSUBE(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) { + assert(OpNo == 2 && "Don't know how to promote this operand!"); + return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDValue(N, 0), N->getOperand(0), + N->getOperand(1), + GetPromotedInteger(N->getOperand(2))); +} + SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_ANY_EXTEND(SDNode *N) { SDValue Op = GetPromotedInteger(N->getOperand(0)); return DAG.getNode(ISD::ANY_EXTEND, N->getDebugLoc(), N->getValueType(0), Op); @@ -1063,7 +1105,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandShiftByConstant(SDNode *N, unsigned Amt, TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::ADDC, TLI.getTypeToExpandTo(NVT))) { // Emit this X << 1 as X+X. - SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(NVT, MVT::Flag); + SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(NVT, MVT::i1); SDValue LoOps[2] = { InL, InL }; Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDC, dl, VTList, LoOps, 2); SDValue HiOps[3] = { InH, InH, Lo.getValue(1) }; @@ -1299,7 +1341,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUB(SDNode *N, TLI.getTypeToExpandTo(NVT)); if (hasCarry) { - SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(NVT, MVT::Flag); + SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(NVT, MVT::i1); if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) { Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADDC, dl, VTList, LoOps, 2); HiOps[2] = Lo.getValue(1); @@ -1344,7 +1386,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUBC(SDNode *N, DebugLoc dl = N->getDebugLoc(); GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(0), LHSL, LHSH); GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(1), RHSL, RHSH); - SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(LHSL.getValueType(), MVT::Flag); + SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(LHSL.getValueType(), MVT::i1); SDValue LoOps[2] = { LHSL, RHSL }; SDValue HiOps[3] = { LHSH, RHSH }; @@ -1358,8 +1400,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUBC(SDNode *N, Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUBE, dl, VTList, HiOps, 3); } - // Legalized the flag result - switch anything that used the old flag to - // use the new one. + // Legalized the second result (carry bit) - switch anything that used the + // result to use the new one. ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(N, 1), Hi.getValue(1)); } @@ -1370,7 +1412,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUBE(SDNode *N, DebugLoc dl = N->getDebugLoc(); GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(0), LHSL, LHSH); GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(1), RHSL, RHSH); - SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(LHSL.getValueType(), MVT::Flag); + SDVTList VTList = DAG.getVTList(LHSL.getValueType(), MVT::i1); SDValue LoOps[3] = { LHSL, RHSL, N->getOperand(2) }; SDValue HiOps[3] = { LHSH, RHSH }; @@ -1378,8 +1420,8 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUBE(SDNode *N, HiOps[2] = Lo.getValue(1); Hi = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), dl, VTList, HiOps, 3); - // Legalized the flag result - switch anything that used the old flag to - // use the new one. + // Legalized the second result (carry bit) - switch anything that used the + // result to use the new one. ReplaceValueWith(SDValue(N, 1), Hi.getValue(1)); } |