diff options
author | Nick Lewycky <nicholas@mxc.ca> | 2011-12-02 22:16:29 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nick Lewycky <nicholas@mxc.ca> | 2011-12-02 22:16:29 +0000 |
commit | 8a8d479214745c82ef00f08d4e4f1c173b5f9ce2 (patch) | |
tree | db4233da588d41bdf07d31520db63e841eb5dce4 /lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | |
parent | c4f0b309eeaa479de9bbf62eaf304931a526f622 (diff) |
Move global variables in TargetMachine into new TargetOptions class. As an API
change, now you need a TargetOptions object to create a TargetMachine. Clang
patch to follow.
One small functionality change in PTX. PTX had commented out the machine
verifier parts in their copy of printAndVerify. That now calls the version in
LLVMTargetMachine. Users of PTX who need verification disabled should rely on
not passing the command-line flag to enable it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | 79 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp index d8208a4433..62c2c6ae6c 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ CommitTargetLoweringOpt(const TargetLowering::TargetLoweringOpt &TLO) { /// specified expression for the same cost as the expression itself, or 2 if we /// can compute the negated form more cheaply than the expression itself. static char isNegatibleForFree(SDValue Op, bool LegalOperations, + const TargetOptions *Options, unsigned Depth = 0) { // No compile time optimizations on this type. if (Op.getValueType() == MVT::ppcf128) @@ -383,34 +384,39 @@ static char isNegatibleForFree(SDValue Op, bool LegalOperations, return LegalOperations ? 0 : 1; case ISD::FADD: // FIXME: determine better conditions for this xform. - if (!UnsafeFPMath) return 0; + if (!Options->UnsafeFPMath) return 0; // fold (fsub (fadd A, B)) -> (fsub (fneg A), B) - if (char V = isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Depth+1)) + if (char V = isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Options, + Depth + 1)) return V; // fold (fneg (fadd A, B)) -> (fsub (fneg B), A) - return isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(1), LegalOperations, Depth+1); + return isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(1), LegalOperations, Options, + Depth + 1); case ISD::FSUB: // We can't turn -(A-B) into B-A when we honor signed zeros. - if (!UnsafeFPMath) return 0; + if (!Options->UnsafeFPMath) return 0; // fold (fneg (fsub A, B)) -> (fsub B, A) return 1; case ISD::FMUL: case ISD::FDIV: - if (HonorSignDependentRoundingFPMath()) return 0; + if (Options->HonorSignDependentRoundingFPMath()) return 0; // fold (fneg (fmul X, Y)) -> (fmul (fneg X), Y) or (fmul X, (fneg Y)) - if (char V = isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Depth+1)) + if (char V = isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Options, + Depth + 1)) return V; - return isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(1), LegalOperations, Depth+1); + return isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(1), LegalOperations, Options, + Depth + 1); case ISD::FP_EXTEND: case ISD::FP_ROUND: case ISD::FSIN: - return isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Depth+1); + return isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Options, + Depth + 1); } } @@ -434,10 +440,11 @@ static SDValue GetNegatedExpression(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, } case ISD::FADD: // FIXME: determine better conditions for this xform. - assert(UnsafeFPMath); + assert(DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath); // fold (fneg (fadd A, B)) -> (fsub (fneg A), B) - if (isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Depth+1)) + if (isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, + &DAG.getTarget().Options, Depth+1)) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FSUB, Op.getDebugLoc(), Op.getValueType(), GetNegatedExpression(Op.getOperand(0), DAG, LegalOperations, Depth+1), @@ -449,7 +456,7 @@ static SDValue GetNegatedExpression(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, Op.getOperand(0)); case ISD::FSUB: // We can't turn -(A-B) into B-A when we honor signed zeros. - assert(UnsafeFPMath); + assert(DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath); // fold (fneg (fsub 0, B)) -> B if (ConstantFPSDNode *N0CFP = dyn_cast<ConstantFPSDNode>(Op.getOperand(0))) @@ -462,10 +469,11 @@ static SDValue GetNegatedExpression(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, case ISD::FMUL: case ISD::FDIV: - assert(!HonorSignDependentRoundingFPMath()); + assert(!DAG.getTarget().Options.HonorSignDependentRoundingFPMath()); // fold (fneg (fmul X, Y)) -> (fmul (fneg X), Y) - if (isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, Depth+1)) + if (isNegatibleForFree(Op.getOperand(0), LegalOperations, + &DAG.getTarget().Options, Depth+1)) return DAG.getNode(Op.getOpcode(), Op.getDebugLoc(), Op.getValueType(), GetNegatedExpression(Op.getOperand(0), DAG, LegalOperations, Depth+1), @@ -5254,20 +5262,22 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFADD(SDNode *N) { if (N0CFP && !N1CFP) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N1, N0); // fold (fadd A, 0) -> A - if (UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && N1CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && + N1CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) return N0; // fold (fadd A, (fneg B)) -> (fsub A, B) - if (isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations) == 2) + if (isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations, &DAG.getTarget().Options) == 2) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FSUB, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0, GetNegatedExpression(N1, DAG, LegalOperations)); // fold (fadd (fneg A), B) -> (fsub B, A) - if (isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations) == 2) + if (isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations, &DAG.getTarget().Options) == 2) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FSUB, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N1, GetNegatedExpression(N0, DAG, LegalOperations)); // If allowed, fold (fadd (fadd x, c1), c2) -> (fadd x, (fadd c1, c2)) - if (UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD && - N0.getNode()->hasOneUse() && isa<ConstantFPSDNode>(N0.getOperand(1))) + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && + N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD && N0.getNode()->hasOneUse() && + isa<ConstantFPSDNode>(N0.getOperand(1))) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0.getOperand(0), DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0.getOperand(1), N1)); @@ -5292,17 +5302,19 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFSUB(SDNode *N) { if (N0CFP && N1CFP && VT != MVT::ppcf128) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FSUB, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0, N1); // fold (fsub A, 0) -> A - if (UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && N1CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && + N1CFP && N1CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) return N0; // fold (fsub 0, B) -> -B - if (UnsafeFPMath && N0CFP && N0CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) { - if (isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations)) + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && + N0CFP && N0CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) { + if (isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations, &DAG.getTarget().Options)) return GetNegatedExpression(N1, DAG, LegalOperations); if (!LegalOperations || TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::FNEG, VT)) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FNEG, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N1); } // fold (fsub A, (fneg B)) -> (fadd A, B) - if (isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations)) + if (isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations, &DAG.getTarget().Options)) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0, GetNegatedExpression(N1, DAG, LegalOperations)); @@ -5329,10 +5341,12 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFMUL(SDNode *N) { if (N0CFP && !N1CFP) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N1, N0); // fold (fmul A, 0) -> 0 - if (UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && N1CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && + N1CFP && N1CFP->getValueAPF().isZero()) return N1; // fold (fmul A, 0) -> 0, vector edition. - if (UnsafeFPMath && ISD::isBuildVectorAllZeros(N1.getNode())) + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && + ISD::isBuildVectorAllZeros(N1.getNode())) return N1; // fold (fmul X, 2.0) -> (fadd X, X) if (N1CFP && N1CFP->isExactlyValue(+2.0)) @@ -5343,8 +5357,10 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFMUL(SDNode *N) { return DAG.getNode(ISD::FNEG, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0); // fold (fmul (fneg X), (fneg Y)) -> (fmul X, Y) - if (char LHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations)) { - if (char RHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations)) { + if (char LHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations, + &DAG.getTarget().Options)) { + if (char RHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations, + &DAG.getTarget().Options)) { // Both can be negated for free, check to see if at least one is cheaper // negated. if (LHSNeg == 2 || RHSNeg == 2) @@ -5355,7 +5371,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFMUL(SDNode *N) { } // If allowed, fold (fmul (fmul x, c1), c2) -> (fmul x, (fmul c1, c2)) - if (UnsafeFPMath && N1CFP && N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FMUL && + if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath && + N1CFP && N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FMUL && N0.getNode()->hasOneUse() && isa<ConstantFPSDNode>(N0.getOperand(1))) return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, N0.getOperand(0), DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, @@ -5383,8 +5400,10 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFDIV(SDNode *N) { // (fdiv (fneg X), (fneg Y)) -> (fdiv X, Y) - if (char LHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations)) { - if (char RHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations)) { + if (char LHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations, + &DAG.getTarget().Options)) { + if (char RHSNeg = isNegatibleForFree(N1, LegalOperations, + &DAG.getTarget().Options)) { // Both can be negated for free, check to see if at least one is cheaper // negated. if (LHSNeg == 2 || RHSNeg == 2) @@ -5637,7 +5656,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFNEG(SDNode *N) { SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0); EVT VT = N->getValueType(0); - if (isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations)) + if (isNegatibleForFree(N0, LegalOperations, &DAG.getTarget().Options)) return GetNegatedExpression(N0, DAG, LegalOperations); // Transform fneg(bitconvert(x)) -> bitconvert(x^sign) to avoid loading |