aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2012-11-16 18:55:49 +0000
committerDuncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>2012-11-16 18:55:49 +0000
commitafe4539f8ea9e12404dce0d67b421d8decb2f0fb (patch)
tree1fc36cae1e9dc425262cf6075b6465baa9bb8d87
parent661dfdc9b7e8ea9f65f4af0dca677adc96889773 (diff)
Fix PR14361: wrong simplification of A+B==B+A. You may think that the old logic
replaced by this patch is equivalent to the new logic, but you'd be wrong, and that's exactly where the bug was. There's a similar bug in instsimplify which manifests itself as instsimplify failing to simplify this, rather than doing it wrong, see next commit. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168181 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp16
-rw-r--r--test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll18
2 files changed, 32 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
index 8cb4a59cba..e223a049f0 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
@@ -2356,8 +2356,20 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
// Try not to increase register pressure.
BO0->hasOneUse() && BO1->hasOneUse()) {
// Determine Y and Z in the form icmp (X+Y), (X+Z).
- Value *Y = (A == C || A == D) ? B : A;
- Value *Z = (C == A || C == B) ? D : C;
+ Value *Y, *Z;
+ if (A == C) {
+ Y = B;
+ Z = D;
+ } else if (A == D) {
+ Y = B;
+ Z = C;
+ } else if (B == C) {
+ Y = A;
+ Z = D;
+ } else if (B == D) {
+ Y = A;
+ Z = C;
+ }
return new ICmpInst(Pred, Y, Z);
}
diff --git a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
index eaff87d695..8e064a4f2f 100644
--- a/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
+++ b/test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp.ll
@@ -659,3 +659,21 @@ define i1 @test64(i8 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
; CHECK-NEXT: %c = icmp eq i8 %1, %a
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %c
}
+
+define i1 @test65(i64 %A, i64 %B) {
+ %s1 = add i64 %A, %B
+ %s2 = add i64 %A, %B
+ %cmp = icmp eq i64 %s1, %s2
+; CHECK: @test65
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
+ ret i1 %cmp
+}
+
+define i1 @test66(i64 %A, i64 %B) {
+ %s1 = add i64 %A, %B
+ %s2 = add i64 %B, %A
+ %cmp = icmp eq i64 %s1, %s2
+; CHECK: @test66
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
+ ret i1 %cmp
+}