diff options
author | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2006-02-17 04:20:13 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2006-02-17 04:20:13 +0000 |
commit | a648df2871d2f266cdaf8a913553bfb5de027ee0 (patch) | |
tree | e97da01e66ff160c61ffddd68227fed38cb65619 | |
parent | 5755b17044b5929b89f06f6f8d19e9ccd4d6c0c9 (diff) |
add note about div by power of 2
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@26253 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Target/X86/README.txt | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/README.txt b/lib/Target/X86/README.txt index 5a2da2d3d2..bab702e96e 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/README.txt +++ b/lib/Target/X86/README.txt @@ -443,3 +443,35 @@ when we can spare a register. It reduces code size. It's not clear whether we should use pxor or xorps / xorpd to clear XMM registers. The choice may depend on subtarget information. We should do some more experiments on different x86 machines. + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +Evaluate what the best way to codegen sdiv X, (2^C) is. For X/8, we currently +get this: + +int %test1(int %X) { + %Y = div int %X, 8 + ret int %Y +} + +_test1: + movl 4(%esp), %eax + movl %eax, %ecx + sarl $31, %ecx + shrl $29, %ecx + addl %ecx, %eax + sarl $3, %eax + ret + +GCC knows several different ways to codegen it, one of which is this: + +_test1: + movl 4(%esp), %eax + cmpl $-1, %eax + leal 7(%eax), %ecx + cmovle %ecx, %eax + sarl $3, %eax + ret + +which is probably slower, but it's interesting at least :) + |