| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-05-27 | ACPI: Clean up acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() to eliminate __iomem. | Lv Zheng | |
| ACPICA doesn't include protections around address space checking, Linux build tests always complain increased sparse warnings around ACPICA internal acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() invocations. This patch tries to fix this issue permanently. There are 2 choices left for us to solve this issue: 1. Add __iomem address space awareness into ACPICA. 2. Remove sparse checker of __iomem from ACPICA source code. This patch chooses solution 2, because: 1. Most of the acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() invocations are used for ACPICA. table mappings, which in fact are not IO addresses. 2. The only IO addresses usage is for "system memory space" mapping code in: drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c drivers/acpi/acpica/evrgnini.c drivers/acpi/acpica/exregion.c The mapped address is accessed in the handler of "system memory space" - acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler(). This function in fact can be changed to invoke acpi_os_read/write_memory() so that __iomem can always be type-casted in the OSL layer. According to the above investigation, we drew the following conclusion: It is not a good idea to introduce __iomem address space awareness into ACPICA mostly in order to protect non-IO addresses. We can simply remove __iomem for acpi_os_map/unmap_memory() to remove __iomem checker for ACPICA code. Then we need to enforce external usages to invoke other APIs that are aware of __iomem address space. The external usages are: drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c drivers/char/tpm/tpm_acpi.c drivers/acpi/nvs.c This patch thus performs cleanups in this way: 1. Add acpi_os_map/unmap_iomem() to be invoked by non-ACPICA code. 2. Remove __iomem from acpi_os_map/unmap_memory(). Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | |||
| 2014-05-27 | ACPICA: Linux headers: Add <acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h> | Lv Zheng | |
| From ACPICA's perspective, <acpi/actypes.h> should be included after inclusion of <acpi/platform/acenv.h>. But currently in Linux, <acpi/platform/aclinux.h> included by <acpi/platform/acenv.h> has included <acpi/actypes.h> to find ACPICA types for inline functions. This causes the following problem: 1. Redundant code in <asm/acpi.h> and <acpi/platform/aclinux.h>: Linux must be careful to keep conditions for <acpi/actypes.h> inclusion consistent with the conditions for <acpi/platform/aclinux.h> inclusion. Which finally leads to the issue that we have to keep many useless macro definitions in <acpi/platform/aclinux.h> or <asm/acpi.h>. Such conditions include: COMPILER_DEPENDENT_UINT64 COMPILER_DEPENDENT_INT64 ACPI_INLINE ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE ACPI_EXTERNAL_XFACE ACPI_INTERNAL_XFACE ACPI_INTERNAL_VAR_XFACE ACPI_MUTEX_TYPE DEBUGGER_THREADING ACPI_ACQUIRE_GLOBAL_LOCK ACPI_RELEASE_GLOBAL_LOCK ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE They have default implementations in <include/acpi/platform/acenv.h> while Linux need to keep a copy in <asm/acpi.h> to avoid build errors. This patch introduces <acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h> to fix this issue by splitting conditions and declarations (most of them are inline functions) into 2 header files so that the wrong inclusion of <acpi/actypes.h> can be removed from <acpi/platform/aclinux.h>. This patch also removes old ACPI_NATIVE_INTERFACE_HEADER mechanism which is not preferred by Linux and adds the platform/acenvex.h to be the solution to solve this issue. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | |||
