aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt b/Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt
index c472ffacc2f..8666070d318 100644
--- a/Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt
+++ b/Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ is something called unbounded priority inversion. That is when the high
priority process is prevented from running by a lower priority process for
an undetermined amount of time.
-The classic example of unbounded priority inversion is were you have three
+The classic example of unbounded priority inversion is where you have three
processes, let's call them processes A, B, and C, where A is the highest
priority process, C is the lowest, and B is in between. A tries to grab a lock
that C owns and must wait and lets C run to release the lock. But in the
@@ -333,11 +333,11 @@ cmpxchg is basically the following function performed atomically:
unsigned long _cmpxchg(unsigned long *A, unsigned long *B, unsigned long *C)
{
- unsigned long T = *A;
- if (*A == *B) {
- *A = *C;
- }
- return T;
+ unsigned long T = *A;
+ if (*A == *B) {
+ *A = *C;
+ }
+ return T;
}
#define cmpxchg(a,b,c) _cmpxchg(&a,&b,&c)
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ process this is rather easy to know what needs to be adjusted.
The functions implementing the task adjustments are rt_mutex_adjust_prio,
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio (same as the former, but expects the task pi_lock
-to already be taken), rt_mutex_get_prio, and rt_mutex_setprio.
+to already be taken), rt_mutex_getprio, and rt_mutex_setprio.
rt_mutex_getprio and rt_mutex_setprio are only used in __rt_mutex_adjust_prio.
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ priority back.
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio examines the result of rt_mutex_getprio, and if the
result does not equal the task's current priority, then rt_mutex_setprio
is called to adjust the priority of the task to the new priority.
-Note that rt_mutex_setprio is defined in kernel/sched.c to implement the
+Note that rt_mutex_setprio is defined in kernel/sched/core.c to implement the
actual change in priority.
It is interesting to note that __rt_mutex_adjust_prio can either increase
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ contention).
try_to_take_rt_mutex is used every time the task tries to grab a mutex in the
slow path. The first thing that is done here is an atomic setting of
the "Has Waiters" flag of the mutex's owner field. Yes, this could really
-be false, because if the the mutex has no owner, there are no waiters and
+be false, because if the mutex has no owner, there are no waiters and
the current task also won't have any waiters. But we don't have the lock
yet, so we assume we are going to be a waiter. The reason for this is to
play nice for those architectures that do have CMPXCHG. By setting this flag
@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ here.
The waiter structure has a "task" field that points to the task that is blocked
on the mutex. This field can be NULL the first time it goes through the loop
-or if the task is a pending owner and had it's mutex stolen. If the "task"
+or if the task is a pending owner and had its mutex stolen. If the "task"
field is NULL then we need to set up the accounting for it.
Task blocks on mutex
@@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ do have CMPXCHG, that check is done in the fast path, but it is still needed
in the slow path too. If a waiter of a mutex woke up because of a signal
or timeout between the time the owner failed the fast path CMPXCHG check and
the grabbing of the wait_lock, the mutex may not have any waiters, thus the
-owner still needs to make this check. If there are no waiters than the mutex
+owner still needs to make this check. If there are no waiters then the mutex
owner field is set to NULL, the wait_lock is released and nothing more is
needed.