diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt | 85 |
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt index 66ef8f35613..a0b005d2bd9 100644 --- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt +++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> i386: - Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> + Zwane Mwaikambo <zwanem@gmail.com> ppc64: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@austin.ibm.com> Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ A: When doing make defconfig, Enable CPU hotplug support "Processor type and Features" -> Support for Hotpluggable CPUs -Make sure that you have CONFIG_HOTPLUG, and CONFIG_SMP turned on as well. +Make sure that you have CONFIG_SMP turned on as well. You would need to enable CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU for SMP suspend/resume support as well. @@ -207,6 +207,30 @@ by making it not-removable. In such cases you will also notice that the online file is missing under cpu0. +Q: Is CPU0 removable on X86? +A: Yes. If kernel is compiled with CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y, CPU0 is +removable by default. Otherwise, CPU0 is also removable by kernel option +cpu0_hotplug. + +But some features depend on CPU0. Two known dependencies are: + +1. Resume from hibernate/suspend depends on CPU0. Hibernate/suspend will fail if +CPU0 is offline and you need to online CPU0 before hibernate/suspend can +continue. +2. PIC interrupts also depend on CPU0. CPU0 can't be removed if a PIC interrupt +is detected. + +It's said poweroff/reboot may depend on CPU0 on some machines although I haven't +seen any poweroff/reboot failure so far after CPU0 is offline on a few tested +machines. + +Please let me know if you know or see any other dependencies of CPU0. + +If the dependencies are under your control, you can turn on CPU0 hotplug feature +either by CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0 or by kernel parameter cpu0_hotplug. + +--Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> + Q: How do i find out if a particular CPU is not removable? A: Depending on the implementation, some architectures may show this by the absence of the "online" file. This is done if it can be determined ahead of @@ -243,8 +267,8 @@ Q: If i have some kernel code that needs to be aware of CPU arrival and A: This is what you would need in your kernel code to receive notifications. #include <linux/cpu.h> - static int __cpuinit foobar_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, - unsigned long action, void *hcpu) + static int foobar_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, + unsigned long action, void *hcpu) { unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu; @@ -261,7 +285,7 @@ A: This is what you would need in your kernel code to receive notifications. return NOTIFY_OK; } - static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata foobar_cpu_notifer = + static struct notifier_block foobar_cpu_notifier = { .notifier_call = foobar_cpu_callback, }; @@ -288,12 +312,57 @@ things will happen if a notifier in path sent a BAD notify code. Q: I don't see my action being called for all CPUs already up and running? A: Yes, CPU notifiers are called only when new CPUs are on-lined or offlined. If you need to perform some action for each cpu already in the system, then + do this: for_each_online_cpu(i) { foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, CPU_UP_PREPARE, i); foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, CPU_ONLINE, i); } + However, if you want to register a hotplug callback, as well as perform + some initialization for CPUs that are already online, then do this: + + Version 1: (Correct) + --------- + + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); + + for_each_online_cpu(i) { + foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, + CPU_UP_PREPARE, i); + foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, + CPU_ONLINE, i); + } + + /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ + __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); + + cpu_notifier_register_done(); + + Note that the following code is *NOT* the right way to achieve this, + because it is prone to an ABBA deadlock between the cpu_add_remove_lock + and the cpu_hotplug.lock. + + Version 2: (Wrong!) + --------- + + get_online_cpus(); + + for_each_online_cpu(i) { + foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, + CPU_UP_PREPARE, i); + foobar_cpu_callback(&foobar_cpu_notifier, + CPU_ONLINE, i); + } + + register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); + + put_online_cpus(); + + So always use the first version shown above when you want to register + callbacks as well as initialize the already online CPUs. + + Q: If i would like to develop cpu hotplug support for a new architecture, what do i need at a minimum? A: The following are what is required for CPU hotplug infrastructure to work @@ -346,8 +415,10 @@ A: There is no clear spec defined way from ACPI that can give us that CPUs in MADT as hotpluggable CPUS. In the case there are no disabled CPUS we assume 1/2 the number of CPUs currently present can be hotplugged. - Caveat: Today's ACPI MADT can only provide 256 entries since the apicid field - in MADT is only 8 bits. + Caveat: ACPI MADT can only provide 256 entries in systems with only ACPI 2.0c + or earlier ACPI version supported, because the apicid field in MADT is only + 8 bits. From ACPI 3.0, this limitation was removed since the apicid field + was extended to 32 bits with x2APIC introduced. User Space Notification |