aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/check-perf-trace.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-07-30 04:23:56 +0530
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2013-08-07 23:02:48 +0200
commit23d328994b548d6822b88fe7e1903652afc354e0 (patch)
treed2eb8f99ce3d27a1719d8cc86b1802ba85645793 /tools/perf/scripts/python/check-perf-trace.py
parentc095ba7224d8edc71dcef0d655911399a8bd4a3f (diff)
cpufreq: Fix misplaced call to cpufreq_update_policy()
The call to cpufreq_update_policy() is placed in the CPU hotplug callback of cpufreq_stats, which has a higher priority than the CPU hotplug callback of cpufreq-core. As a result, during CPU_ONLINE/CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN, we end up calling cpufreq_update_policy() *before* calling cpufreq_add_dev() ! And for uninitialized CPUs, it just returns silently, not doing anything. To add to that, cpufreq_stats is not even the right place to call cpufreq_update_policy() to begin with. The cpufreq core ought to handle this in its own callback, from an elegance/relevance perspective. So move the invocation of cpufreq_update_policy() to cpufreq_cpu_callback, and place it *after* cpufreq_add_dev(). Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/check-perf-trace.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions