aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/panic.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2011-11-28 09:46:22 -0800
committerTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2011-11-28 09:46:22 -0800
commitd4bbf7e7759afc172e2bfbc5c416324590049cdd (patch)
tree7eab5ee5481cd3dcf1162329fec827177640018a /kernel/panic.c
parenta150439c4a97db379f0ed6faa46fbbb6e7bf3cb2 (diff)
parent401d0069cb344f401bc9d264c31db55876ff78c0 (diff)
Merge branch 'master' into x86/memblock
Conflicts & resolutions: * arch/x86/xen/setup.c dc91c728fd "xen: allow extra memory to be in multiple regions" 24aa07882b "memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free..." conflicted on xen_add_extra_mem() updates. The resolution is trivial as the latter just want to replace memblock_x86_reserve_range() with memblock_reserve(). * drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c 166e9278a3f "x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/" 5dfe8660a3d "bootmem: Replace work_with_active_regions() with..." conflicted as the former moved the file under drivers/iommu/. Resolved by applying the chnages from the latter on the moved file. * mm/Kconfig 6661672053a "memblock: add NO_BOOTMEM config symbol" c378ddd53f9 "memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option" conflicted trivially. Both added config options. Just letting both add their own options resolves the conflict. * mm/memblock.c d1f0ece6cdc "mm/memblock.c: small function definition fixes" ed7b56a799c "memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce()" confliected. The former updates function removed by the latter. Resolution is trivial. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/panic.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/panic.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 69231670eb9..b2659360421 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
}
mdelay(PANIC_TIMER_STEP);
}
+ }
+ if (panic_timeout != 0) {
/*
* This will not be a clean reboot, with everything
* shutting down. But if there is a chance of
@@ -175,6 +177,7 @@ static const struct tnt tnts[] = {
{ TAINT_WARN, 'W', ' ' },
{ TAINT_CRAP, 'C', ' ' },
{ TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, 'I', ' ' },
+ { TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 'O', ' ' },
};
/**
@@ -192,6 +195,7 @@ static const struct tnt tnts[] = {
* 'W' - Taint on warning.
* 'C' - modules from drivers/staging are loaded.
* 'I' - Working around severe firmware bug.
+ * 'O' - Out-of-tree module has been loaded.
*
* The string is overwritten by the next call to print_tainted().
*/