diff options
author | Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> | 2011-12-31 11:44:01 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> | 2012-01-06 14:13:58 -0800 |
commit | 3ce696d12b26c9c1cfedeb194a02606bef2854a4 (patch) | |
tree | 85ea2e7bf2009e4f329a2cd9cec5335b27ad80d6 | |
parent | 4347b837ab999865063649cf801ba4f8d7e8748e (diff) |
futex: Fix uninterruptible loop due to gate_area
commit e6780f7243eddb133cc20ec37fa69317c218b709 upstream.
It was found (by Sasha) that if you use a futex located in the gate
area we get stuck in an uninterruptible infinite loop, much like the
ZERO_PAGE issue.
While looking at this problem, PeterZ realized you'll get into similar
trouble when hitting any install_special_pages() mapping. And are there
still drivers setting up their own special mmaps without page->mapping,
and without special VM or pte flags to make get_user_pages fail?
In most cases, if page->mapping is NULL, we do not need to retry at all:
Linus points out that even /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches poses no problem,
because it ends up using remove_mapping(), which takes care not to
interfere when the page reference count is raised.
But there is still one case which does need a retry: if memory pressure
called shmem_writepage in between get_user_pages_fast dropping page
table lock and our acquiring page lock, then the page gets switched from
filecache to swapcache (and ->mapping set to NULL) whatever the refcount.
Fault it back in to get the page->mapping needed for key->shared.inode.
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 8b6da250723..6487e4cb993 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -314,17 +314,29 @@ again: #endif lock_page(page_head); + + /* + * If page_head->mapping is NULL, then it cannot be a PageAnon + * page; but it might be the ZERO_PAGE or in the gate area or + * in a special mapping (all cases which we are happy to fail); + * or it may have been a good file page when get_user_pages_fast + * found it, but truncated or holepunched or subjected to + * invalidate_complete_page2 before we got the page lock (also + * cases which we are happy to fail). And we hold a reference, + * so refcount care in invalidate_complete_page's remove_mapping + * prevents drop_caches from setting mapping to NULL beneath us. + * + * The case we do have to guard against is when memory pressure made + * shmem_writepage move it from filecache to swapcache beneath us: + * an unlikely race, but we do need to retry for page_head->mapping. + */ if (!page_head->mapping) { + int shmem_swizzled = PageSwapCache(page_head); unlock_page(page_head); put_page(page_head); - /* - * ZERO_PAGE pages don't have a mapping. Avoid a busy loop - * trying to find one. RW mapping would have COW'd (and thus - * have a mapping) so this page is RO and won't ever change. - */ - if ((page_head == ZERO_PAGE(address))) - return -EFAULT; - goto again; + if (shmem_swizzled) + goto again; + return -EFAULT; } /* |