diff options
author | Jim Stichnoth <stichnot@chromium.org> | 2013-07-17 12:13:48 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jim Stichnoth <stichnot@chromium.org> | 2013-07-17 12:13:48 -0700 |
commit | cc8deaf49f79eb22c4edc8c0f44ef64668b3be4a (patch) | |
tree | 24e2b88702daa994195a1531d790510207589766 /test | |
parent | 5a4bc23e85f58fecbc4e0a6d6fec3c1193bbc350 (diff) |
Disallow a global address in the x86-64 displacement field.
This applies only to %r15 sandboxed memory references. The problem
is that if the index register is negative, the sandboxing operation
will cause the index to become a large positive 32-bit value, which
combined with the displacement, will overflow and try to reference
memory outside the sandbox. This situation may legitimately occur
if the compiler happens to construct a (constant) interior pointer
to the middle of the global struct/array, and then dereferences it
with a variable offset.
After this fix, pnacl/scripts/testsuite_known_failures_pnacl.txt can
be updated to remove the "aha x86-64" known failure.
BUG= https://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/issues/detail?id=3517
R=eliben@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/17987002
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rw-r--r-- | test/CodeGen/X86/no-global-in-disp-x86-64.ll | 50 |
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/no-global-in-disp-x86-64.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/no-global-in-disp-x86-64.ll new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..db911ccff9 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/no-global-in-disp-x86-64.ll @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +; RUN: pnacl-llc -O2 -mtriple=x86_64-none-nacl < %s | \ +; RUN: FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NACLON +; RUN: pnacl-llc -O2 -mtriple=x86_64-linux < %s | \ +; RUN: FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NACLOFF + +; This test is derived from the following C code: +; +; int myglobal[100]; +; void test(int arg) +; { +; myglobal[arg] = arg; +; myglobal[arg+1] = arg; +; } +; int main(int argc, char **argv) +; { +; test(argc); +; } +; +; The goal is NOT to produce an instruction with "myglobal" as the +; displacement value in any addressing mode, e.g. this (bad) instruction: +; +; movl %eax, %nacl:myglobal(%r15,%rax,4) +; +; The NACLOFF test is a canary that tries to ensure that the NACLON test is +; testing the right thing. If the NACLOFF test starts failing, it's likely +; that the LLVM -O2 optimizations are no longer generating the problematic +; pattern that NACLON tests for. In that case, the test should be modified. + + +@myglobal = global [100 x i32] zeroinitializer, align 4 + +define void @test(i32 %arg) #0 { +entry: +; NACLON: test: +; NACLON-NOT: mov{{.*}}nacl:myglobal( +; NACLOFF: test: +; NACLOFF: mov{{.*}}myglobal( + %arg.addr = alloca i32, align 4 + store i32 %arg, i32* %arg.addr, align 4 + %0 = load i32* %arg.addr, align 4 + %1 = load i32* %arg.addr, align 4 + %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32]* @myglobal, i32 0, i32 %1 + store i32 %0, i32* %arrayidx, align 4 + %2 = load i32* %arg.addr, align 4 + %3 = load i32* %arg.addr, align 4 + %add = add nsw i32 %3, 1 + %arrayidx1 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32]* @myglobal, i32 0, i32 %add + store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx1, align 4 + ret void +} |