aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2012-09-15 11:43:14 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2012-09-15 11:43:14 +0000
commit1c8db50a9aca4229ebee75ed9cfbf8b222292787 (patch)
tree256811a988ee3d8bd4d914ef9e71fa224c3cc253 /lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
parent5a7dd43f045f2f78adc81b497c5d78bd9da0884e (diff)
Port the SSAUpdater-based promotion logic from the old SROA pass to the
new one, and add support for running the new pass in that mode and in that slot of the pass manager. With this the new pass can completely replace the old one within the pipeline. The strategy for enabling or disabling the SSAUpdater logic is to do it by making the requirement of the domtree analysis optional. By default, it is required and we get the standard mem2reg approach. This is usually the desired strategy when run in stand-alone situations. Within the CGSCC pass manager, we disable requiring of the domtree analysis and consequentially trigger fallback to the SSAUpdater promotion. In theory this would allow the pass to re-use a domtree if one happened to be available even when run in a mode that doesn't require it. In practice, it lets us have a single pass rather than two which was simpler for me to wrap my head around. There is a hidden flag to force the use of the SSAUpdater code path for the purpose of testing. The primary testing strategy is just to run the existing tests through that path. One notable difference is that it has custom code to handle lifetime markers, and one of the tests has been enhanced to exercise that code. This has survived a bootstrap and the test suite without serious correctness issues, however my run of the test suite produced *very* alarming performance numbers. I don't entirely understand or trust them though, so more investigation is on-going. To aid my understanding of the performance impact of the new SROA now that it runs throughout the optimization pipeline, I'm enabling it by default in this commit, and will disable it again once the LNT bots have picked up one iteration with it. I want to get those bots (which are much more stable) to evaluate the impact of the change before I jump to any conclusions. NOTE: Several Clang tests will fail because they run -O3 and check the result's order of output. They'll go back to passing once I disable it again. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163965 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp7
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp b/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
index 0d15870f01..105b2886d9 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ UseGVNAfterVectorization("use-gvn-after-vectorization",
cl::desc("Run GVN instead of Early CSE after vectorization passes"));
static cl::opt<bool> UseNewSROA("use-new-sroa",
- cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
+ cl::init(true), cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Enable the new, experimental SROA pass"));
PassManagerBuilder::PassManagerBuilder() {
@@ -154,7 +154,10 @@ void PassManagerBuilder::populateModulePassManager(PassManagerBase &MPM) {
// Start of function pass.
// Break up aggregate allocas, using SSAUpdater.
- MPM.add(createScalarReplAggregatesPass(-1, false));
+ if (UseNewSROA)
+ MPM.add(createSROAPass(/*RequiresDomTree*/ false));
+ else
+ MPM.add(createScalarReplAggregatesPass(-1, false));
MPM.add(createEarlyCSEPass()); // Catch trivial redundancies
if (!DisableSimplifyLibCalls)
MPM.add(createSimplifyLibCallsPass()); // Library Call Optimizations