Fall back to the selection dag isel to select tail calls.

This shouldn't affect codegen for -O0 compiles as tail call markers are not
emitted in unoptimized compiles.  Testing with the external/internal nightly
test suite reveals no change in compile time performance.  Testing with -O1,
-O2 and -O3 with fast-isel enabled did not cause any compile-time or
execution-time failures.  All tests were performed on my x86 machine.
I'll monitor our arm testers to ensure no regressions occur there.

In an upcoming clang patch I will be marking the objc_autoreleaseReturnValue
and objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue as tail calls unconditionally.  While
it's theoretically true that this is just an optimization, it's an
optimization that we very much want to happen even at -O0, or else ARC
applications become substantially harder to debug.

Part of rdar://12553082

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169796 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
index b26b9d7e29..3e78b4c0a1 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
@@ -1529,6 +1529,10 @@ bool X86FastISel::X86SelectCall(const Instruction *I) {
   if (const IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(CI))
     return X86VisitIntrinsicCall(*II);
 
+  // Allow SelectionDAG isel to handle tail calls.
+  if (cast<CallInst>(I)->isTailCall())
+    return false;
+
   return DoSelectCall(I, 0);
 }