aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEvan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>2009-07-25 00:33:29 +0000
committerEvan Cheng <evan.cheng@apple.com>2009-07-25 00:33:29 +0000
commit66ac53165e17b7c76b8c69e57bde623d44ec492e (patch)
treeb9d935e416aac3ec82ffea50d7f543a2f590dba4 /lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
parent4711326d60251e9394192032e6646fff0d113eee (diff)
Change Thumb2 jumptable codegen to one that uses two level jumps:
Before: adr r12, #LJTI3_0_0 ldr pc, [r12, +r0, lsl #2] LJTI3_0_0: .long LBB3_24 .long LBB3_30 .long LBB3_31 .long LBB3_32 After: adr r12, #LJTI3_0_0 add pc, r12, +r0, lsl #2 LJTI3_0_0: b.w LBB3_24 b.w LBB3_30 b.w LBB3_31 b.w LBB3_32 This has several advantages. 1. This will make it easier to optimize this to a TBB / TBH instruction + (smaller) table. 2. This eliminate the need for ugly asm printer hack to force the address into thumb addresses (bit 0 is one). 3. Same codegen for pic and non-pic. 4. This eliminate the need to align the table so constantpool island pass won't have to over-estimate the size. Based on my calculation, the later is probably slightly faster as well since ldr pc with shifter address is very slow. That is, it should be a win as long as the HW implementation can do a reasonable job of branch predict the second branch. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@77024 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp25
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
index e3c62735d8..7e2bbcdc97 100644
--- a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ const char *ARMTargetLowering::getTargetNodeName(unsigned Opcode) const {
case ARMISD::tCALL: return "ARMISD::tCALL";
case ARMISD::BRCOND: return "ARMISD::BRCOND";
case ARMISD::BR_JT: return "ARMISD::BR_JT";
+ case ARMISD::BR2_JT: return "ARMISD::BR2_JT";
case ARMISD::RET_FLAG: return "ARMISD::RET_FLAG";
case ARMISD::PIC_ADD: return "ARMISD::PIC_ADD";
case ARMISD::CMP: return "ARMISD::CMP";
@@ -1704,15 +1705,27 @@ SDValue ARMTargetLowering::LowerBR_JT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
SDValue UId = DAG.getConstant(AFI->createJumpTableUId(), PTy);
SDValue JTI = DAG.getTargetJumpTable(JT->getIndex(), PTy);
Table = DAG.getNode(ARMISD::WrapperJT, dl, MVT::i32, JTI, UId);
+ if (Subtarget->isThumb2()) {
+ // Thumb2 uses a two-level jump. That is, it jumps into the jump table
+ // which does another jump to the destination. This also makes it easier
+ // to translate it to TBB / TBH later.
+ // FIXME: This might not work if the function is extremely large.
+ return DAG.getNode(ARMISD::BR2_JT, dl, MVT::Other, Chain, Table, Index,
+ JTI, UId);
+ }
+
Index = DAG.getNode(ISD::MUL, dl, PTy, Index, DAG.getConstant(4, PTy));
SDValue Addr = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, dl, PTy, Index, Table);
- bool isPIC = getTargetMachine().getRelocationModel() == Reloc::PIC_;
- Addr = DAG.getLoad(isPIC ? (MVT)MVT::i32 : PTy, dl,
- Chain, Addr, NULL, 0);
- Chain = Addr.getValue(1);
- if (isPIC)
+ if (getTargetMachine().getRelocationModel() == Reloc::PIC_) {
+ Addr = DAG.getLoad((MVT)MVT::i32, dl, Chain, Addr, NULL, 0);
+ Chain = Addr.getValue(1);
Addr = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, dl, PTy, Addr, Table);
- return DAG.getNode(ARMISD::BR_JT, dl, MVT::Other, Chain, Addr, JTI, UId);
+ return DAG.getNode(ARMISD::BR_JT, dl, MVT::Other, Chain, Addr, JTI, UId);
+ } else {
+ Addr = DAG.getLoad(PTy, dl, Chain, Addr, NULL, 0);
+ Chain = Addr.getValue(1);
+ return DAG.getNode(ARMISD::BR_JT, dl, MVT::Other, Chain, Addr, JTI, UId);
+ }
}
static SDValue LowerFP_TO_INT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {