diff options
author | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2004-07-23 08:24:23 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2004-07-23 08:24:23 +0000 |
commit | ec2bc645053e9051ada01fac6a555df17a85c91d (patch) | |
tree | 03fd93fa7edc2b0a29a91c261d1e6e4f82a504ec /lib/CodeGen/RegAllocIterativeScan.cpp | |
parent | 5c2e282865821ba65795a2d14bd95e5a82a6be41 (diff) |
Improve comments a bit
Use an explicit LiveRange class to represent ranges instead of an std::pair.
This is a minor cleanup, but is really intended to make a future patch simpler
and less invasive.
Alkis, could you please take a look at LiveInterval::liveAt? I suspect that
you can add an operator<(unsigned) to LiveRange, allowing us to speed up the
upper_bound call by quite a bit (this would also apply to other callers of
upper/lower_bound). I would do it myself, but I still don't understand that
crazy liveAt function, despite the comment. :)
Basically I would like to see this:
LiveRange dummy(index, index+1);
Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(),
ranges.end(),
dummy);
Turn into:
Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(),
ranges.end(),
index);
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@15130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/RegAllocIterativeScan.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions