Rename SlotIndexes to match how they are used.

The old naming scheme (load/use/def/store) can be traced back to an old
linear scan article, but the names don't match how slots are actually
used.

The load and store slots are not needed after the deferred spill code
insertion framework was deleted.

The use and def slots don't make any sense because we are using
half-open intervals as is customary in C code, but the names suggest
closed intervals.  In reality, these slots were used to distinguish
early-clobber defs from normal defs.

The new naming scheme also has 4 slots, but the names match how the
slots are really used.  This is a purely mechanical renaming, but some
of the code makes a lot more sense now.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@144503 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugVariables.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugVariables.cpp
index 0414692d13..eb54baa729 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugVariables.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/LiveDebugVariables.cpp
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ bool LDVImpl::collectDebugValues(MachineFunction &mf) {
       // DBG_VALUE has no slot index, use the previous instruction instead.
       SlotIndex Idx = MBBI == MBB->begin() ?
         LIS->getMBBStartIdx(MBB) :
-        LIS->getInstructionIndex(llvm::prior(MBBI)).getDefIndex();
+        LIS->getInstructionIndex(llvm::prior(MBBI)).getRegSlot();
       // Handle consecutive DBG_VALUE instructions with the same slot index.
       do {
         if (handleDebugValue(MBBI, Idx)) {
@@ -575,15 +575,15 @@ UserValue::addDefsFromCopies(LiveInterval *LI, unsigned LocNo,
     // Is LocNo extended to reach this copy? If not, another def may be blocking
     // it, or we are looking at a wrong value of LI.
     SlotIndex Idx = LIS.getInstructionIndex(MI);
-    LocMap::iterator I = locInts.find(Idx.getUseIndex());
+    LocMap::iterator I = locInts.find(Idx.getRegSlot(true));
     if (!I.valid() || I.value() != LocNo)
       continue;
 
     if (!LIS.hasInterval(DstReg))
       continue;
     LiveInterval *DstLI = &LIS.getInterval(DstReg);
-    const VNInfo *DstVNI = DstLI->getVNInfoAt(Idx.getDefIndex());
-    assert(DstVNI && DstVNI->def == Idx.getDefIndex() && "Bad copy value");
+    const VNInfo *DstVNI = DstLI->getVNInfoAt(Idx.getRegSlot());
+    assert(DstVNI && DstVNI->def == Idx.getRegSlot() && "Bad copy value");
     CopyValues.push_back(std::make_pair(DstLI, DstVNI));
   }