Use LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION rather than '// do not implement' comments.

Also removes some redundant DNI comments on function declarations already
using the macro.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175466 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h b/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h
index a27f77db14..14bcaef6d1 100644
--- a/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h
+++ b/include/llvm/ADT/APFloat.h
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ namespace llvm {
     /* The definition of equality is not straightforward for floating point,
        so we won't use operator==.  Use one of the following, or write
        whatever it is you really mean. */
-    // bool operator==(const APFloat &) const;     // DO NOT IMPLEMENT
+    bool operator==(const APFloat &) const LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION;
 
     /* IEEE comparison with another floating point number (NaNs
        compare unordered, 0==-0). */
diff --git a/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h b/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h
index 20cdae3255..aeb78484c6 100644
--- a/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h
+++ b/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h
@@ -234,17 +234,17 @@ public:
   pointer getNodePtrUnchecked() const { return NodePtr; }
 };
 
-// do not implement. this is to catch errors when people try to use
-// them as random access iterators
+// These are to catch errors when people try to use them as random access
+// iterators.
 template<typename T>
-void operator-(int, ilist_iterator<T>);
+void operator-(int, ilist_iterator<T>) LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION;
 template<typename T>
-void operator-(ilist_iterator<T>,int);
+void operator-(ilist_iterator<T>,int) LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION;
 
 template<typename T>
-void operator+(int, ilist_iterator<T>);
+void operator+(int, ilist_iterator<T>) LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION;
 template<typename T>
-void operator+(ilist_iterator<T>,int);
+void operator+(ilist_iterator<T>,int) LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION;
 
 // operator!=/operator== - Allow mixed comparisons without dereferencing
 // the iterator, which could very likely be pointing to end().