| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
nested-name-specifiers so that they don't gobble the template name (or
operator-function-id) unless there is also a
template-argument-list. For example, given
T::template apply
we would previously consume both "template" and "apply" as part of
parsing the nested-name-specifier, then error when we see that there
is no "<" starting a template argument list. Now, we parse such
constructs tentatively, and back off if the "<" is not present. This
allows us to parse dependent template names as one would use them for,
e.g., template template parameters:
template<typename T, template<class> class X = T::template apply>
struct MetaSomething;
Also, test default arguments for template template parameters.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@86841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@85236 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
nested name specifiers. Now we emit stuff like:
t.cpp:8:13: error: unknown type name 'X'
static foo::X P;
~~~~ ^
instead of:
t.cpp:8:16: error: invalid token after top level declarator
static foo::X P;
^
This is inspired by a really awful error message I got from
g++ when I misspelt diag::kind as diag::Kind.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
failures that involve malformed types, e.g., "typename X::foo" where
"foo" isn't a type, or "std::vector<void>" that doens't instantiate
properly.
Similarly, be a bit smarter in our handling of ambiguities that occur
in Sema::getTypeName, to eliminate duplicate error messages about
ambiguous name lookup.
This eliminates two XFAILs in test/SemaCXX, one of which was crying
out to us, trying to tell us that we were producing repeated error
messages.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68251 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
within nested-name-specifiers, e.g., for the "apply" in
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
At present, we can't instantiate these nested-name-specifiers, so our
testing is sketchy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@68081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
class members to the corresponding in-class declaration.
Diagnose the erroneous use of 'static' on out-of-line definitions of
class members.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
std::vector<int>::allocator_type
When we parse a template-id that names a type, it will become either a
template-id annotation (which is a parsed representation of a
template-id that has not yet been through semantic analysis) or a
typename annotation (where semantic analysis has resolved the
template-id to an actual type), depending on the context. We only
produce a type in contexts where we know that we only need type
information, e.g., in a type specifier. Otherwise, we create a
template-id annotation that can later be "upgraded" by transforming it
into a typename annotation when the parser needs a type. This occurs,
for example, when we've parsed "std::vector<int>" above and then see
the '::' after it. However, it means that when writing something like
this:
template<> class Outer::Inner<int> { ... };
We have two tokens to represent Outer::Inner<int>: one token for the
nested name specifier Outer::, and one template-id annotation token
for Inner<int>, which will be passed to semantic analysis to define
the class template specialization.
Most of the churn in the template tests in this patch come from an
improvement in our error recovery from ill-formed template-ids.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65467 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
