Make the implicit-int handling error recovery stuff handle C++

nested name specifiers.  Now we emit stuff like:

t.cpp:8:13: error: unknown type name 'X'
static foo::X  P;
       ~~~~ ^

instead of:

t.cpp:8:16: error: invalid token after top level declarator
static foo::X  P;
               ^

This is inspired by a really awful error message I got from 
g++ when I misspelt diag::kind as diag::Kind.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
index 7805040048..a5aa2dcb52 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 namespace N { 
   namespace M {
-    template<typename T> struct Promote; // expected-note{{previous definition is here}}
+    template<typename T> struct Promote;
     
     template<> struct Promote<short> {
       typedef int type;
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ N::M::template; // expected-error{{expected template name after 'template' keywo
                // expected-error{{expected unqualified-id}}
 
 N::M::template Promote; // expected-error{{expected '<' after 'template Promote' in nested name specifier}} \
-// expected-error{{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}} \
-// expected-error{{redefinition of 'Promote' as different kind of symbol}}
+// expected-error{{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
 
 namespace N {
   template<typename T> struct A;