aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp36
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 44afbd7d1b..584cc3e871 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -4083,6 +4083,42 @@ Sema::CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(SourceLocation NewLoc,
return false;
}
+/// \brief Perform semantic analysis for the given dependent function
+/// template specialization. The only possible way to get a dependent
+/// function template specialization is with a friend declaration,
+/// like so:
+///
+/// template <class T> void foo(T);
+/// template <class T> class A {
+/// friend void foo<>(T);
+/// };
+///
+/// There really isn't any useful analysis we can do here, so we
+/// just store the information.
+bool
+Sema::CheckDependentFunctionTemplateSpecialization(FunctionDecl *FD,
+ const TemplateArgumentListInfo &ExplicitTemplateArgs,
+ LookupResult &Previous) {
+ // Remove anything from Previous that isn't a function template in
+ // the correct context.
+ DeclContext *FDLookupContext = FD->getDeclContext()->getLookupContext();
+ LookupResult::Filter F = Previous.makeFilter();
+ while (F.hasNext()) {
+ NamedDecl *D = F.next()->getUnderlyingDecl();
+ if (!isa<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D) ||
+ !FDLookupContext->Equals(D->getDeclContext()->getLookupContext()))
+ F.erase();
+ }
+ F.done();
+
+ // Should this be diagnosed here?
+ if (Previous.empty()) return true;
+
+ FD->setDependentTemplateSpecialization(Context, Previous.asUnresolvedSet(),
+ ExplicitTemplateArgs);
+ return false;
+}
+
/// \brief Perform semantic analysis for the given function template
/// specialization.
///