diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Parse/Parser.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Parse/Parser.cpp | 180 |
1 files changed, 151 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp b/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp index 3725e2b845..bee802faaa 100644 --- a/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp +++ b/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp @@ -1301,6 +1301,143 @@ TemplateIdAnnotation *Parser::takeTemplateIdAnnotation(const Token &tok) { return Id; } +void Parser::AnnotateScopeToken(CXXScopeSpec &SS, bool IsNewAnnotation) { + // Push the current token back into the token stream (or revert it if it is + // cached) and use an annotation scope token for current token. + if (PP.isBacktrackEnabled()) + PP.RevertCachedTokens(1); + else + PP.EnterToken(Tok); + Tok.setKind(tok::annot_cxxscope); + Tok.setAnnotationValue(Actions.SaveNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(SS)); + Tok.setAnnotationRange(SS.getRange()); + + // In case the tokens were cached, have Preprocessor replace them + // with the annotation token. We don't need to do this if we've + // just reverted back to a prior state. + if (IsNewAnnotation) + PP.AnnotateCachedTokens(Tok); +} + +/// \brief Attempt to classify the name at the current token position. This may +/// form a type, scope or primary expression annotation, or replace the token +/// with a typo-corrected keyword. This is only appropriate when the current +/// name must refer to an entity which has already been declared. +/// +/// \param IsAddressOfOperand Must be \c true if the name is preceded by an '&' +/// and might possibly have a dependent nested name specifier. +/// \param CCC Indicates how to perform typo-correction for this name. If NULL, +/// no typo correction will be performed. +Parser::AnnotatedNameKind +Parser::TryAnnotateName(bool IsAddressOfOperand, + CorrectionCandidateCallback *CCC) { + assert(Tok.is(tok::identifier) || Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope)); + + const bool EnteringContext = false; + const bool WasScopeAnnotation = Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope); + + CXXScopeSpec SS; + if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && + ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier(SS, ParsedType(), EnteringContext)) + return ANK_Error; + + if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier) || SS.isInvalid()) { + if (TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(EnteringContext, false, SS, + !WasScopeAnnotation)) + return ANK_Error; + return ANK_Unresolved; + } + + IdentifierInfo *Name = Tok.getIdentifierInfo(); + SourceLocation NameLoc = Tok.getLocation(); + + // FIXME: Move the tentative declaration logic into ClassifyName so we can + // typo-correct to tentatively-declared identifiers. + if (isTentativelyDeclared(Name)) { + // Identifier has been tentatively declared, and thus cannot be resolved as + // an expression. Fall back to annotating it as a type. + if (TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(EnteringContext, false, SS, + !WasScopeAnnotation)) + return ANK_Error; + return Tok.is(tok::annot_typename) ? ANK_Success : ANK_TentativeDecl; + } + + Token Next = NextToken(); + + // Look up and classify the identifier. We don't perform any typo-correction + // after a scope specifier, because in general we can't recover from typos + // there (eg, after correcting 'A::tempalte B<X>::C', we would need to jump + // back into scope specifier parsing). + Sema::NameClassification Classification + = Actions.ClassifyName(getCurScope(), SS, Name, NameLoc, Next, + IsAddressOfOperand, SS.isEmpty() ? CCC : 0); + + switch (Classification.getKind()) { + case Sema::NC_Error: + return ANK_Error; + + case Sema::NC_Keyword: + // The identifier was typo-corrected to a keyword. + Tok.setIdentifierInfo(Name); + Tok.setKind(Name->getTokenID()); + PP.TypoCorrectToken(Tok); + if (SS.isNotEmpty()) + AnnotateScopeToken(SS, !WasScopeAnnotation); + // We've "annotated" this as a keyword. + return ANK_Success; + + case Sema::NC_Unknown: + // It's not something we know about. Leave it unannotated. + break; + + case Sema::NC_Type: + Tok.setKind(tok::annot_typename); + setTypeAnnotation(Tok, Classification.getType()); + Tok.setAnnotationEndLoc(NameLoc); + if (SS.isNotEmpty()) + Tok.setLocation(SS.getBeginLoc()); + PP.AnnotateCachedTokens(Tok); + return ANK_Success; + + case Sema::NC_Expression: + Tok.setKind(tok::annot_primary_expr); + setExprAnnotation(Tok, Classification.getExpression()); + Tok.setAnnotationEndLoc(NameLoc); + if (SS.isNotEmpty()) + Tok.setLocation(SS.getBeginLoc()); + PP.AnnotateCachedTokens(Tok); + return ANK_Success; + + case Sema::NC_TypeTemplate: + if (Next.isNot(tok::less)) { + // This may be a type template being used as a template template argument. + if (SS.isNotEmpty()) + AnnotateScopeToken(SS, !WasScopeAnnotation); + return ANK_TemplateName; + } + // Fall through. + case Sema::NC_FunctionTemplate: { + // We have a type or function template followed by '<'. + ConsumeToken(); + UnqualifiedId Id; + Id.setIdentifier(Name, NameLoc); + if (AnnotateTemplateIdToken( + TemplateTy::make(Classification.getTemplateName()), + Classification.getTemplateNameKind(), SS, SourceLocation(), Id)) + return ANK_Error; + return ANK_Success; + } + + case Sema::NC_NestedNameSpecifier: + llvm_unreachable("already parsed nested name specifier"); + } + + // Unable to classify the name, but maybe we can annotate a scope specifier. + if (SS.isNotEmpty()) + AnnotateScopeToken(SS, !WasScopeAnnotation); + return ANK_Unresolved; +} + /// TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken - If the current token position is on a /// typename (possibly qualified in C++) or a C++ scope specifier not followed /// by a typename, TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken will replace one or more tokens @@ -1404,13 +1541,24 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken(bool EnteringContext, bool NeedType) { } // Remembers whether the token was originally a scope annotation. - bool wasScopeAnnotation = Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope); + bool WasScopeAnnotation = Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope); CXXScopeSpec SS; if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) if (ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier(SS, ParsedType(), EnteringContext)) return true; + return TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(EnteringContext, NeedType, + SS, !WasScopeAnnotation); +} + +/// \brief Try to annotate a type or scope token, having already parsed an +/// optional scope specifier. \p IsNewScope should be \c true unless the scope +/// specifier was extracted from an existing tok::annot_cxxscope annotation. +bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(bool EnteringContext, + bool NeedType, + CXXScopeSpec &SS, + bool IsNewScope) { if (Tok.is(tok::identifier)) { IdentifierInfo *CorrectedII = 0; // Determine whether the identifier is a type name. @@ -1492,21 +1640,7 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken(bool EnteringContext, bool NeedType) { return false; // A C++ scope specifier that isn't followed by a typename. - // Push the current token back into the token stream (or revert it if it is - // cached) and use an annotation scope token for current token. - if (PP.isBacktrackEnabled()) - PP.RevertCachedTokens(1); - else - PP.EnterToken(Tok); - Tok.setKind(tok::annot_cxxscope); - Tok.setAnnotationValue(Actions.SaveNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(SS)); - Tok.setAnnotationRange(SS.getRange()); - - // In case the tokens were cached, have Preprocessor replace them - // with the annotation token. We don't need to do this if we've - // just reverted back to the state we were in before being called. - if (!wasScopeAnnotation) - PP.AnnotateCachedTokens(Tok); + AnnotateScopeToken(SS, IsNewScope); return false; } @@ -1529,19 +1663,7 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken(bool EnteringContext) { if (SS.isEmpty()) return false; - // Push the current token back into the token stream (or revert it if it is - // cached) and use an annotation scope token for current token. - if (PP.isBacktrackEnabled()) - PP.RevertCachedTokens(1); - else - PP.EnterToken(Tok); - Tok.setKind(tok::annot_cxxscope); - Tok.setAnnotationValue(Actions.SaveNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(SS)); - Tok.setAnnotationRange(SS.getRange()); - - // In case the tokens were cached, have Preprocessor replace them with the - // annotation token. - PP.AnnotateCachedTokens(Tok); + AnnotateScopeToken(SS, true); return false; } |