aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-08-25 22:51:20 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-08-25 22:51:20 +0000
commit495c35d291da48c4f5655bbb54d15128ddde0d4d (patch)
treec7374a4cef2354d3548b4273ab3a067c385888ff /test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp
parentce3ff2bd3a3386dbc209d3cba4b8769173b274c1 (diff)
Improve support for out-of-line definitions of nested templates and
their members, including member class template, member function templates, and member classes and functions of member templates. To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g., template<typename X> template<typename Y> X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) { return X(); } we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general (i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the current scope specifier to be a current instantiation. Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp')
-rw-r--r--test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp
index 05ab3e9c1b..3adabcf934 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/nested-template.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
-
class A;
class S {
@@ -25,6 +24,7 @@ struct Outer {
T foo(U);
template<typename V> T bar(V);
+ template<typename V> T* bar(V);
};
};
@@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ public:
void f(X, Y);
};
-#if 0
-// FIXME: These don't parse properly because we can't handle the template-name
-// "Inner0" or "Inner1" after the dependent type Outer<X>.
template<typename X>
template<typename Y>
void Outer<X>::Inner0<Y>::f(X, Y) {
@@ -66,4 +63,10 @@ template<typename Z>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::bar(Z) {
return X();
}
-#endif \ No newline at end of file
+
+template<typename X>
+template<typename Y>
+template<typename Z>
+X* Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::bar(Z) {
+ return 0;
+}