Represent C++ direct initializers as ParenListExprs before semantic analysis

instead of having a special-purpose function.

- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
  AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
  ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
  int x = {1};
  int x({1});
  int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
   initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
  always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
  back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
  sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.

The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)

This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/nested-incomplete-class.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/nested-incomplete-class.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a4bfccb8d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/nested-incomplete-class.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s
+
+template <typename T>
+struct foo {
+  struct bar;
+
+  bar fn() {
+    // Should not get errors about bar being incomplete here.
+    bar b = bar(1, 2);
+    return b;
+  }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+struct foo<T>::bar {
+  bar(int, int);
+};
+
+void fn() {
+  foo<int>().fn();
+}