diff options
| author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-03-11 16:48:53 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-03-11 16:48:53 +0000 |
| commit | 4fdf1faedbca40787fd277a6fbd5061fd69b2708 (patch) | |
| tree | 008da53407dbd3facf3ffa4d9c8b1558b2617228 /test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp | |
| parent | 511d7aba3b12853fdb88729a0313b80a60eab8ad (diff) | |
Add basic, hackish support for instantiation of typedefs in a class
template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp | 8 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp index 2b6de3363b..f75b279a44 100644 --- a/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp +++ b/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ -// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s -// fails due to exact diagnostic matching +// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -std=c++98 -verify %s namespace A { struct C { static int cx; @@ -151,5 +150,10 @@ void ::global_func2(int) { } // expected-error{{definition or redeclaration of ' void N::f() { } // okay +struct Y; // expected-note{{forward declaration of 'struct Y'}} +Y::foo y; // expected-error{{incomplete type 'struct Y' named in nested name specifier}} \ + // FIXME: ugly: expected-error{{invalid token after top level declarator}} + X::X() : a(5) { } // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'X'}} \ // expected-error{{expected function body after function declarator}} + |