When performing initialization of a copy of a temporary object, use

direct-initialization (rather than copy-initialization) to initialize
the temporary, allowing explicit constructors. Fixes PR8342.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@118880 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp
index 641eaa9411..a28a1941ec 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ class Y : public X { };
 
 void f(Y y, int *ip, float *fp) {
   X x1 = y; // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'X'}}
-  X x2 = 0; // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying variable}}
-  X x3 = ip; // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying variable}}
+  X x2 = 0;
+  X x3 = ip;
   X x4 = fp; // expected-error{{no viable conversion}}
   X x2a(0); // expected-error{{call to constructor of 'X' is ambiguous}}
   X x3a(ip);