diff options
| author | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2012-01-05 04:12:21 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2012-01-05 04:12:21 +0000 |
| commit | cb7709c06027448c754dd03e2e521d82d04818bf (patch) | |
| tree | 4566bb699a7b846fa7bb7893440d6e45278f3e65 /test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp | |
| parent | ec9ea7200718478e8a976529defbe21942a11c9c (diff) | |
PR10828: Produce a warning when a no-arguments function is declared in block
scope, when no other indication is provided that the user intended to declare a
function rather than a variable.
Remove some false positives from the existing 'parentheses disambiguated as a
function' warning by suppressing it when the declaration is marked as 'typedef'
or 'extern'.
Add a new warning group -Wvexing-parse containing both of these warnings.
The new warning is enabled by default; despite a number of false positives (and
one bug) in clang's test-suite, I have only found genuine bugs with it when
running it over a significant quantity of real C++ code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@147599 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp index 5648d022b5..3cfddb3a41 100644 --- a/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp +++ b/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ void test() (void)(i1 ? BadDerived() : BadBase()); // b2.1 (hierarchy stuff) - const Base constret(); - const Derived constder(); + const Base constret(); // expected-warning {{interpreted as a function declaration}} + const Derived constder(); // expected-warning {{interpreted as a function declaration}} // should use const overload A a1((i1 ? constret() : Base()).trick()); A a2((i1 ? Base() : constret()).trick()); |