Use the naming class from the overloaded lookup when access-checking an

address of overloaded function, instead of assuming that a nested name
specifier was used.  A nested name specifier is not required for static
functions.

Fixes PR6886.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@102107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/addr-of-overloaded-function.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/addr-of-overloaded-function.cpp
index 391fc30959..f8b00df173 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/addr-of-overloaded-function.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/addr-of-overloaded-function.cpp
@@ -70,3 +70,19 @@ struct C {
     int (&fp)() = f; // expected-error{{address of overloaded function 'f' does not match required type 'int ()'}}
   }
 };
+
+// PR6886
+namespace test0 {
+  void myFunction(void (*)(void *));
+
+  class Foo {
+    void foo();
+
+    static void bar(void*);
+    static void bar();
+  };
+
+  void Foo::foo() {
+    myFunction(bar);
+  }
+}