aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/Analysis/method-call.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>2012-08-15 21:56:23 +0000
committerJordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>2012-08-15 21:56:23 +0000
commit7f660857309a14c036a80ef90b40bf8f68fda9da (patch)
treece02b420c45ce45f255370f25e56f4478e88d3fa /test/Analysis/method-call.cpp
parentb5f9eb8a0709082bba8e8de3a6c643928570aaa0 (diff)
[analyzer] If we call a C++ method on an object, assume it's non-null.
This is analogous to our handling of pointer dereferences: if we dereference a pointer that may or may not be null, we assume it's non-null from then on. While some implementations of C++ (including ours) allow you to call a non-virtual method through a null pointer of object type, it is technically disallowed by the C++ standard, and should not prune out any real paths in practice. [class.mfct.non-static]p1: A non-static member function may be called for an object of its class type, or for an object of a class derived from its class type... (a null pointer value does not refer to an object) We can also make the same assumption about function pointers. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@161992 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Analysis/method-call.cpp')
-rw-r--r--test/Analysis/method-call.cpp20
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/test/Analysis/method-call.cpp b/test/Analysis/method-call.cpp
index 91da532456..912062739c 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/method-call.cpp
+++ b/test/Analysis/method-call.cpp
@@ -1,25 +1,37 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-ipa=inlining -analyzer-store region -verify %s
-// XFAIL: *
void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
+
struct A {
int x;
A(int a) { x = a; }
int getx() const { return x; }
};
+void testNullObject(A *a) {
+ clang_analyzer_eval(a); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
+ (void)a->getx(); // assume we know what we're doing
+ clang_analyzer_eval(a); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+}
+
+
+// FIXME: These require constructor inlining to be enabled.
+
void f1() {
A x(3);
- clang_analyzer_eval(x.getx() == 3); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ // should be TRUE
+ clang_analyzer_eval(x.getx() == 3); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void f2() {
const A &x = A(3);
- clang_analyzer_eval(x.getx() == 3); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ // should be TRUE
+ clang_analyzer_eval(x.getx() == 3); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}
void f3() {
const A &x = (A)3;
- clang_analyzer_eval(x.getx() == 3); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ // should be TRUE
+ clang_analyzer_eval(x.getx() == 3); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
}