diff options
author | Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> | 2012-09-05 17:11:26 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com> | 2012-09-05 17:11:26 +0000 |
commit | 6ebea89be233eaba5e29de8cf3524ad150c860bb (patch) | |
tree | 68df18a7da0db02be83366a8d97a83193d69cd54 /test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp | |
parent | 4e45dba1c0234eec7b7c348dbbf568c5ac9fc471 (diff) |
[analyzer] Be more forgiving about calling methods on struct rvalues.
The problem is that the value of 'this' in a C++ member function call
should always be a region (or NULL). However, if the object is an rvalue,
it has no associated region (only a conjured symbol or LazyCompoundVal).
For now, we handle this in two ways:
1) Actually respect MaterializeTemporaryExpr. Before, it was relying on
CXXConstructExpr to create temporary regions for all struct values.
Now it just does the right thing: if the value is not in a temporary
region, create one.
2) Have CallEvent recognize the case where its 'this' pointer is a
non-region, and just return UnknownVal to keep from confusing clients.
The long-term problem is being tracked internally in <rdar://problem/12137950>,
but this makes many test cases pass.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@163220 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp | 87 |
1 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp b/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3581566bdc --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -x c %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -x c++ -analyzer-config c++-inlining=constructors %s + +void clang_analyzer_eval(int); + +struct S { + int field; + +#if __cplusplus + const struct S *getThis() const { return this; } +#endif +}; + +struct S getS(); + + +void testAssignment() { + struct S s = getS(); + + if (s.field != 42) return; + clang_analyzer_eval(s.field == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} + + s.field = 0; + clang_analyzer_eval(s.field == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} + +#if __cplusplus + clang_analyzer_eval(s.getThis() == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} +#endif +} + + +void testImmediateUse() { + int x = getS().field; + + if (x != 42) return; + clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} + +#if __cplusplus + clang_analyzer_eval((void *)getS().getThis() == (void *)&x); // expected-warning{{FALSE}} +#endif +} + +int getConstrainedField(struct S s) { + if (s.field != 42) return 42; + return s.field; +} + +int getAssignedField(struct S s) { + s.field = 42; + return s.field; +} + +void testArgument() { + clang_analyzer_eval(getConstrainedField(getS()) == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} + clang_analyzer_eval(getAssignedField(getS()) == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} +} + + +//-------------------- +// C++-only tests +//-------------------- + +#if __cplusplus +void testReferenceAssignment() { + const S &s = getS(); + + if (s.field != 42) return; + clang_analyzer_eval(s.field == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} + + clang_analyzer_eval(s.getThis() == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} +} + + +int getConstrainedFieldRef(const S &s) { + if (s.field != 42) return 42; + return s.field; +} + +bool checkThis(const S &s) { + return s.getThis() == &s; +} + +void testReferenceArgument() { + clang_analyzer_eval(getConstrainedFieldRef(getS()) == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} + clang_analyzer_eval(checkThis(getS())); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} +} +#endif |