diff options
| author | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2012-08-17 00:12:27 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk> | 2012-08-17 00:12:27 +0000 |
| commit | cbf97c5a12c4fe8528a8365087e1d81005589288 (patch) | |
| tree | 5ea4f6ed54add6968f200001659fa7eb1187cb92 /lib/Sema | |
| parent | 0d5a069f66df09b3308ccfdce84a88170034c657 (diff) | |
Don't form a null reference when checking for validity of an anonymous
elaborated type specifier in template instantiation: such a specifier is always
valid because it must be specified within the definition of the type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162068 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp index c7cbc41b30..20e755fdae 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp @@ -988,12 +988,11 @@ TemplateInstantiator::RebuildElaboratedType(SourceLocation KeywordLoc, SourceLocation TagLocation = KeywordLoc; - // FIXME: type might be anonymous. IdentifierInfo *Id = TD->getIdentifier(); // TODO: should we even warn on struct/class mismatches for this? Seems // like it's likely to produce a lot of spurious errors. - if (Keyword != ETK_None && Keyword != ETK_Typename) { + if (Id && Keyword != ETK_None && Keyword != ETK_Typename) { TagTypeKind Kind = TypeWithKeyword::getTagTypeKindForKeyword(Keyword); if (!SemaRef.isAcceptableTagRedeclaration(TD, Kind, /*isDefinition*/false, TagLocation, *Id)) { |