Better diagnostics for range-based for loops with bad range types.

The old error message stating that 'begin' was an undeclared identifier
is replaced with a new message explaining that the error is in the range
expression, along with which of the begin() and end() functions was
problematic if relevant.

Additionally, if the range was a pointer type or defines operator*,
attempt to dereference the range, and offer a FixIt if the modified range
works.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h b/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
index 05a3c611e9..391c0b3f3b 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
+++ b/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h
@@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ public:
                                     Stmt *LoopVar,
                                     SourceLocation RParenLoc) {
     return getSema().BuildCXXForRangeStmt(ForLoc, ColonLoc, Range, BeginEnd,
-                                          Cond, Inc, LoopVar, RParenLoc);
+                                          Cond, Inc, LoopVar, RParenLoc, false);
   }
 
   /// \brief Build a new C++0x range-based for statement.