Semantic analysis for explicit instantiation of class templates. We

still aren't instantiating the definitions of class template members,
and core issues 275 and 259 will both affect the checking that we do
for explicit instantiations (but are not yet implemented).



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71613 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
index f3a31ea0de..d04a5ad6c5 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
@@ -1115,7 +1115,8 @@ bool Sema::RequireCompleteType(SourceLocation Loc, QualType T, unsigned diag,
              Parent && !Spec; Parent = Parent->getParent())
           Spec = dyn_cast<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(Parent);
         assert(Spec && "Not a member of a class template specialization?");
-        return InstantiateClass(Loc, Rec, Pattern, Spec->getTemplateArgs());
+        return InstantiateClass(Loc, Rec, Pattern, Spec->getTemplateArgs(),
+                                /*ExplicitInstantiation=*/false);
       }
     }
   }