aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-03-13 00:33:25 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-03-13 00:33:25 +0000
commit3fd95ce225393fe4a3623e429766a8c3f487ff9d (patch)
tree57008c54cb90b45a481536d1c1a52e7f98053fe0 /lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
parent039df91439aeccc6b8490ddd12b28d9541d80026 (diff)
Improve the representation of operator expressions like "x + y" within
C++ templates. In particular, keep track of the overloaded operators that are visible from the template definition, so that they can be merged with those operators visible via argument-dependent lookup at instantiation time. Refactored the lookup routines for argument-dependent lookup and for operator name lookup, so they can be called without immediately adding the results to an overload set. Instantiation of these expressions is completely wrong. I'll work on that next. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@66851 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
index 4b98d30b47..3f7756ef3e 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
@@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ namespace {
Sema::OwningExprResult VisitDeclRefExpr(DeclRefExpr *E);
Sema::OwningExprResult VisitParenExpr(ParenExpr *E);
Sema::OwningExprResult VisitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator *E);
+ Sema::OwningExprResult VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr(CXXOperatorCallExpr *E);
// Base case. I'm supposed to ignore this.
Sema::OwningExprResult VisitStmt(Stmt *) {
@@ -646,6 +647,32 @@ TemplateExprInstantiator::VisitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator *E) {
}
Sema::OwningExprResult
+TemplateExprInstantiator::VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr(CXXOperatorCallExpr *E) {
+ // FIXME: HACK HACK HACK. This is so utterly and completely wrong
+ // that I don't want to explain it here. I'll just fix it tomorrow
+ // instead.
+ Sema::OwningExprResult LHS = Visit(E->getArg(0));
+ if (LHS.isInvalid())
+ return SemaRef.ExprError();
+
+ Sema::OwningExprResult RHS = Visit(E->getArg(1));
+ if (RHS.isInvalid())
+ return SemaRef.ExprError();
+
+ Sema::OwningExprResult Result
+ = SemaRef.CreateBuiltinBinOp(E->getOperatorLoc(),
+ BinaryOperator::Add,
+ (Expr *)LHS.get(),
+ (Expr *)RHS.get());
+ if (Result.isInvalid())
+ return SemaRef.ExprError();
+
+ LHS.release();
+ RHS.release();
+ return move(Result);
+}
+
+Sema::OwningExprResult
Sema::InstantiateExpr(Expr *E, const TemplateArgument *TemplateArgs,
unsigned NumTemplateArgs) {
TemplateExprInstantiator Instantiator(*this, TemplateArgs, NumTemplateArgs);