Be more careful around dependent nested-name-specifiers, complaining

when they are not complete (since we could not match them up to
anything) and ensuring that enum parsing can cope with dependent
elaborated-type-specifiers. Fixes PR6915 and PR6649.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@102247 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 1075f41399..14d04563d6 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -5117,6 +5117,13 @@ Sema::ActOnDependentTag(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec, TagUseKind TUK,
   }
   assert(Keyword != ETK_None && "Invalid tag kind!");
 
+  if (TUK == TUK_Declaration || TUK == TUK_Definition) {
+    Diag(NameLoc, diag::err_dependent_tag_decl)
+      << (TUK == TUK_Definition) << TagDecl::getTagKindForTypeSpec(TagSpec)
+      << SS.getRange();
+    return true;
+  }
+  
   return Context.getDependentNameType(Keyword, NNS, Name).getAsOpaquePtr();
 }