aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2010-05-15 06:01:05 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2010-05-15 06:01:05 +0000
commit5077c3876beeaed32280af88244e8050078619a8 (patch)
treea33c75c7ad2eedc6e0cbd811555fab85c81971fc /lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
parentf805a6cc00b27ff0bcfc7f821e5d286c32a769ec (diff)
Implement semantic analysis and an AST representation for the named
return value optimization. Sema marks return statements with their NRVO candidates (which may or may not end up using the NRVO), then, at the end of a function body, computes and marks those variables that can be allocated into the return slot. I've checked this locally with some debugging statements (not committed), but there won't be any tests until CodeGen comes along. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@103865 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp181
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 76 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
index d9210f6a1b..f8fe4fe21c 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
@@ -1058,29 +1058,42 @@ Sema::ActOnBreakStmt(SourceLocation BreakLoc, Scope *CurScope) {
return Owned(new (Context) BreakStmt(BreakLoc));
}
-/// IsReturnCopyElidable - Whether returning @p RetExpr from a function that
-/// returns a @p RetType fulfills the criteria for copy elision (C++0x 12.8p34).
-static bool IsReturnCopyElidable(ASTContext &Ctx, QualType RetType,
- Expr *RetExpr) {
+/// \brief Determine whether a return statement is a candidate for the named
+/// return value optimization (C++0x 12.8p34, bullet 1).
+///
+/// \param Ctx The context in which the return expression and type occur.
+///
+/// \param RetType The return type of the function or block.
+///
+/// \param RetExpr The expression being returned from the function or block.
+///
+/// \returns The NRVO candidate variable, if the return statement may use the
+/// NRVO, or NULL if there is no such candidate.
+static const VarDecl *getNRVOCandidate(ASTContext &Ctx, QualType RetType,
+ Expr *RetExpr) {
QualType ExprType = RetExpr->getType();
// - in a return statement in a function with ...
// ... a class return type ...
if (!RetType->isRecordType())
- return false;
+ return 0;
// ... the same cv-unqualified type as the function return type ...
if (!Ctx.hasSameUnqualifiedType(RetType, ExprType))
- return false;
+ return 0;
// ... the expression is the name of a non-volatile automatic object ...
// We ignore parentheses here.
// FIXME: Is this compliant? (Everyone else does it)
const DeclRefExpr *DR = dyn_cast<DeclRefExpr>(RetExpr->IgnoreParens());
if (!DR)
- return false;
+ return 0;
const VarDecl *VD = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(DR->getDecl());
if (!VD)
- return false;
- return VD->getKind() == Decl::Var && VD->hasLocalStorage() &&
- !VD->getType()->isReferenceType() && !VD->getType().isVolatileQualified();
+ return 0;
+
+ if (VD->getKind() == Decl::Var && VD->hasLocalStorage() &&
+ !VD->getType()->isReferenceType() && !VD->getType().isVolatileQualified())
+ return VD;
+
+ return 0;
}
/// ActOnBlockReturnStmt - Utility routine to figure out block's return type.
@@ -1117,46 +1130,58 @@ Sema::ActOnBlockReturnStmt(SourceLocation ReturnLoc, Expr *RetValExp) {
// Otherwise, verify that this result type matches the previous one. We are
// pickier with blocks than for normal functions because we don't have GCC
// compatibility to worry about here.
+ ReturnStmt *Result = 0;
if (CurBlock->ReturnType->isVoidType()) {
if (RetValExp) {
Diag(ReturnLoc, diag::err_return_block_has_expr);
RetValExp->Destroy(Context);
RetValExp = 0;
}
- return Owned(new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp));
- }
-
- if (!RetValExp)
+ Result = new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp, 0);
+ } else if (!RetValExp) {
return StmtError(Diag(ReturnLoc, diag::err_block_return_missing_expr));
+ } else {
+ const VarDecl *NRVOCandidate = 0;
+
+ if (!FnRetType->isDependentType() && !RetValExp->isTypeDependent()) {
+ // we have a non-void block with an expression, continue checking
+
+ // C99 6.8.6.4p3(136): The return statement is not an assignment. The
+ // overlap restriction of subclause 6.5.16.1 does not apply to the case of
+ // function return.
+
+ // In C++ the return statement is handled via a copy initialization.
+ // the C version of which boils down to CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints.
+ NRVOCandidate = getNRVOCandidate(Context, FnRetType, RetValExp);
+ OwningExprResult Res = PerformCopyInitialization(
+ InitializedEntity::InitializeResult(ReturnLoc,
+ FnRetType,
+ NRVOCandidate != 0),
+ SourceLocation(),
+ Owned(RetValExp));
+ if (Res.isInvalid()) {
+ // FIXME: Cleanup temporaries here, anyway?
+ return StmtError();
+ }
+
+ if (RetValExp)
+ RetValExp = MaybeCreateCXXExprWithTemporaries(RetValExp);
- if (!FnRetType->isDependentType() && !RetValExp->isTypeDependent()) {
- // we have a non-void block with an expression, continue checking
-
- // C99 6.8.6.4p3(136): The return statement is not an assignment. The
- // overlap restriction of subclause 6.5.16.1 does not apply to the case of
- // function return.
-
- // In C++ the return statement is handled via a copy initialization.
- // the C version of which boils down to CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints.
- OwningExprResult Res = PerformCopyInitialization(
- InitializedEntity::InitializeResult(ReturnLoc,
- FnRetType,
- IsReturnCopyElidable(Context,
- FnRetType,
- RetValExp)),
- SourceLocation(),
- Owned(RetValExp));
- if (Res.isInvalid()) {
- // FIXME: Cleanup temporaries here, anyway?
- return StmtError();
+ RetValExp = Res.takeAs<Expr>();
+ if (RetValExp)
+ CheckReturnStackAddr(RetValExp, FnRetType, ReturnLoc);
}
- RetValExp = Res.takeAs<Expr>();
- if (RetValExp)
- CheckReturnStackAddr(RetValExp, FnRetType, ReturnLoc);
+ Result = new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp, NRVOCandidate);
}
- return Owned(new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp));
+ // If we need to check for the named return value optimization, save the
+ // return statement in our scope for later processing.
+ if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && FnRetType->isRecordType() &&
+ !CurContext->isDependentContext())
+ FunctionScopes.back()->Returns.push_back(Result);
+
+ return Owned(Result);
}
Action::OwningStmtResult
@@ -1177,6 +1202,7 @@ Sema::ActOnReturnStmt(SourceLocation ReturnLoc, ExprArg rex) {
else // If we don't have a function/method context, bail.
return StmtError();
+ ReturnStmt *Result = 0;
if (FnRetType->isVoidType()) {
if (RetValExp && !RetValExp->isTypeDependent()) {
// C99 6.8.6.4p1 (ext_ since GCC warns)
@@ -1195,10 +1221,9 @@ Sema::ActOnReturnStmt(SourceLocation ReturnLoc, ExprArg rex) {
RetValExp = MaybeCreateCXXExprWithTemporaries(RetValExp);
}
- return Owned(new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp));
- }
-
- if (!RetValExp && !FnRetType->isDependentType()) {
+
+ Result = new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp, 0);
+ } else if (!RetValExp && !FnRetType->isDependentType()) {
unsigned DiagID = diag::warn_return_missing_expr; // C90 6.6.6.4p4
// C99 6.8.6.4p1 (ext_ since GCC warns)
if (getLangOptions().C99) DiagID = diag::ext_return_missing_expr;
@@ -1207,43 +1232,47 @@ Sema::ActOnReturnStmt(SourceLocation ReturnLoc, ExprArg rex) {
Diag(ReturnLoc, DiagID) << FD->getIdentifier() << 0/*fn*/;
else
Diag(ReturnLoc, DiagID) << getCurMethodDecl()->getDeclName() << 1/*meth*/;
- return Owned(new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, (Expr*)0));
- }
-
- if (!FnRetType->isDependentType() && !RetValExp->isTypeDependent()) {
- // we have a non-void function with an expression, continue checking
-
- // C99 6.8.6.4p3(136): The return statement is not an assignment. The
- // overlap restriction of subclause 6.5.16.1 does not apply to the case of
- // function return.
+ Result = new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc);
+ } else {
+ const VarDecl *NRVOCandidate = 0;
+ if (!FnRetType->isDependentType() && !RetValExp->isTypeDependent()) {
+ // we have a non-void function with an expression, continue checking
+
+ // C99 6.8.6.4p3(136): The return statement is not an assignment. The
+ // overlap restriction of subclause 6.5.16.1 does not apply to the case of
+ // function return.
+
+ // In C++ the return statement is handled via a copy initialization.
+ // the C version of which boils down to CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints.
+ NRVOCandidate = getNRVOCandidate(Context, FnRetType, RetValExp);
+ OwningExprResult Res = PerformCopyInitialization(
+ InitializedEntity::InitializeResult(ReturnLoc,
+ FnRetType,
+ NRVOCandidate != 0),
+ SourceLocation(),
+ Owned(RetValExp));
+ if (Res.isInvalid()) {
+ // FIXME: Cleanup temporaries here, anyway?
+ return StmtError();
+ }
- // C++0x [class.copy]p34:
- //
-
-
- // In C++ the return statement is handled via a copy initialization.
- // the C version of which boils down to CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints.
- OwningExprResult Res = PerformCopyInitialization(
- InitializedEntity::InitializeResult(ReturnLoc,
- FnRetType,
- IsReturnCopyElidable(Context,
- FnRetType,
- RetValExp)),
- SourceLocation(),
- Owned(RetValExp));
- if (Res.isInvalid()) {
- // FIXME: Cleanup temporaries here, anyway?
- return StmtError();
+ RetValExp = Res.takeAs<Expr>();
+ if (RetValExp)
+ CheckReturnStackAddr(RetValExp, FnRetType, ReturnLoc);
}
-
- RetValExp = Res.takeAs<Expr>();
- if (RetValExp)
- CheckReturnStackAddr(RetValExp, FnRetType, ReturnLoc);
+
+ if (RetValExp)
+ RetValExp = MaybeCreateCXXExprWithTemporaries(RetValExp);
+ Result = new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp, NRVOCandidate);
}
-
- if (RetValExp)
- RetValExp = MaybeCreateCXXExprWithTemporaries(RetValExp);
- return Owned(new (Context) ReturnStmt(ReturnLoc, RetValExp));
+
+ // If we need to check for the named return value optimization, save the
+ // return statement in our scope for later processing.
+ if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && FnRetType->isRecordType() &&
+ !CurContext->isDependentContext())
+ FunctionScopes.back()->Returns.push_back(Result);
+
+ return Owned(Result);
}
/// CheckAsmLValue - GNU C has an extremely ugly extension whereby they silently