diff options
author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2010-01-31 09:12:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2010-01-31 09:12:51 +0000 |
commit | 9db7dbb918ca49f4ee6c181e4917e7b6ec547353 (patch) | |
tree | ca2970a7b2115f226131005dc0c162108fc18720 /lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp | |
parent | a05315436746963c4034555ca725956507e14553 (diff) |
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several
(necessarily simultaneous) changes:
- CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer
rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The
single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including
constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries
created by the initializer (which we never handled
before!).
- Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers,
since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer.
- Switched base and member initialization over to the new
initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it
- Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when
initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced
by the previous (special-purpose) code.
- Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in
templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is
rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the
type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This
simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in
the AST.
- When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a
dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the
AST, because they'll look like they were explicit.
- Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to
initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it
from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of
constructor.
There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not
regress, for example:
- Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that
does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this
diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for
variables. That's fixed now.
- When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and
copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor
when we're defining the body.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@94952 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp | 86 |
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp index b0dee9c691..5269167df2 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp @@ -2562,7 +2562,18 @@ static void TryConstructorInitialization(Sema &S, Result); return; } - + + // C++0x [dcl.init]p6: + // If a program calls for the default initialization of an object + // of a const-qualified type T, T shall be a class type with a + // user-provided default constructor. + if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default && + Entity.getType().isConstQualified() && + cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Best->Function)->isImplicit()) { + Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_DefaultInitOfConst); + return; + } + // Add the constructor initialization step. Any cv-qualification conversion is // subsumed by the initialization. if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Copy) { @@ -2635,9 +2646,6 @@ static void TryDefaultInitialization(Sema &S, // constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if // T has no accessible default constructor); if (DestType->isRecordType()) { - // FIXME: If a program calls for the default initialization of an object of - // a const-qualified type T, T shall be a class type with a user-provided - // default constructor. return TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, 0, 0, DestType, Sequence); } @@ -3408,7 +3416,8 @@ InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S, CurInit = S.BuildCXXConstructExpr(Loc, Entity.getType(), Constructor, move_arg(ConstructorArgs), - ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit); + ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit, + Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Base); if (CurInit.isInvalid()) return S.ExprError(); @@ -3488,8 +3497,13 @@ bool InitializationSequence::Diagnose(Sema &S, QualType DestType = Entity.getType(); switch (Failure) { case FK_TooManyInitsForReference: - S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_has_multiple_inits) - << SourceRange(Args[0]->getLocStart(), Args[NumArgs - 1]->getLocEnd()); + // FIXME: Customize for the initialized entity? + if (NumArgs == 0) + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_without_init) + << DestType.getNonReferenceType(); + else // FIXME: diagnostic below could be better! + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_has_multiple_inits) + << SourceRange(Args[0]->getLocStart(), Args[NumArgs - 1]->getLocEnd()); break; case FK_ArrayNeedsInitList: @@ -3634,6 +3648,45 @@ bool InitializationSequence::Diagnose(Sema &S, break; case OR_No_Viable_Function: + if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default && + (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Base || + Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Member) && + isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext)) { + // This is implicit default initialization of a member or + // base within a constructor. If no viable function was + // found, notify the user that she needs to explicitly + // initialize this base/member. + CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor + = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext); + if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Base) { + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_missing_default_ctor) + << Constructor->isImplicit() + << S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent()) + << /*base=*/0 + << Entity.getType(); + + RecordDecl *BaseDecl + = Entity.getBaseSpecifier()->getType()->getAs<RecordType>() + ->getDecl(); + S.Diag(BaseDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl) + << S.Context.getTagDeclType(BaseDecl); + } else { + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_missing_default_ctor) + << Constructor->isImplicit() + << S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent()) + << /*member=*/1 + << Entity.getName(); + S.Diag(Entity.getDecl()->getLocation(), diag::note_field_decl); + + if (const RecordType *Record + = Entity.getType()->getAs<RecordType>()) + S.Diag(Record->getDecl()->getLocation(), + diag::note_previous_decl) + << S.Context.getTagDeclType(Record->getDecl()); + } + break; + } + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_ovl_no_viable_function_in_init) << DestType << ArgsRange; S.PrintOverloadCandidates(FailedCandidateSet, Sema::OCD_AllCandidates, @@ -3664,8 +3717,23 @@ bool InitializationSequence::Diagnose(Sema &S, } case FK_DefaultInitOfConst: - S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_default_init_const) - << DestType; + if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Member && + isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext)) { + // This is implicit default-initialization of a const member in + // a constructor. Complain that it needs to be explicitly + // initialized. + CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext); + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_uninitialized_member_in_ctor) + << Constructor->isImplicit() + << S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent()) + << /*const=*/1 + << Entity.getName(); + S.Diag(Entity.getDecl()->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl) + << Entity.getName(); + } else { + S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_default_init_const) + << DestType << (bool)DestType->getAs<RecordType>(); + } break; } |