Complain about attempts to use 'protected' visibility on targets

like Darwin that don't support it.  We should also complain about
invalid -fvisibility=protected, but that information doesn't seem
to exist at the most appropriate time, so I've left a FIXME behind.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
index aa827a40c6..d4b9988d88 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
@@ -1694,9 +1694,16 @@ static void handleVisibilityAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const AttributeList &Attr) {
     type = VisibilityAttr::Hidden;
   else if (TypeStr == "internal")
     type = VisibilityAttr::Hidden; // FIXME
-  else if (TypeStr == "protected")
-    type = VisibilityAttr::Protected;
-  else {
+  else if (TypeStr == "protected") {
+    // Complain about attempts to use protected visibility on targets
+    // (like Darwin) that don't support it.
+    if (!S.Context.getTargetInfo().hasProtectedVisibility()) {
+      S.Diag(Attr.getLoc(), diag::warn_attribute_protected_visibility);
+      type = VisibilityAttr::Default;
+    } else {
+      type = VisibilityAttr::Protected;
+    }
+  } else {
     S.Diag(Attr.getLoc(), diag::warn_attribute_unknown_visibility) << TypeStr;
     return;
   }