diff options
author | Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> | 2012-02-11 23:51:47 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> | 2012-02-11 23:51:47 +0000 |
commit | 5b9cc5df25c2198f270dd1d5c438fdce70d4051d (patch) | |
tree | 8d2c36bd9fe0e47cc5ce4e5a2fd02d8dd0e31f7f /lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | |
parent | ecfcd5655758955d8958dc2a7a7b2c8eff2395b7 (diff) |
Represent C++ direct initializers as ParenListExprs before semantic analysis
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 122 |
1 files changed, 87 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index 6ba3228b08..feffaf13fa 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -2139,9 +2139,8 @@ void Sema::mergeObjCMethodDecls(ObjCMethodDecl *newMethod, /// emitting diagnostics as appropriate. /// /// Declarations using the auto type specifier (C++ [decl.spec.auto]) call back -/// to here in AddInitializerToDecl and AddCXXDirectInitializerToDecl. We can't -/// check them before the initializer is attached. -/// +/// to here in AddInitializerToDecl. We can't check them before the initializer +/// is attached. void Sema::MergeVarDeclTypes(VarDecl *New, VarDecl *Old) { if (New->isInvalidDecl() || Old->isInvalidDecl()) return; @@ -5983,17 +5982,6 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, if (RealDecl == 0 || RealDecl->isInvalidDecl()) return; - // Check for self-references within variable initializers. - if (VarDecl *vd = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(RealDecl)) { - // Variables declared within a function/method body are handled - // by a dataflow analysis. - if (!vd->hasLocalStorage() && !vd->isStaticLocal()) - CheckSelfReference(RealDecl, Init); - } - else { - CheckSelfReference(RealDecl, Init); - } - if (CXXMethodDecl *Method = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(RealDecl)) { // With declarators parsed the way they are, the parser cannot // distinguish between a normal initializer and a pure-specifier. @@ -6018,12 +6006,44 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, return; } + // Check for self-references within variable initializers. + // Variables declared within a function/method body are handled + // by a dataflow analysis. + if (!VDecl->hasLocalStorage() && !VDecl->isStaticLocal()) + CheckSelfReference(RealDecl, Init); + + ParenListExpr *CXXDirectInit = dyn_cast<ParenListExpr>(Init); + // C++11 [decl.spec.auto]p6. Deduce the type which 'auto' stands in for. if (TypeMayContainAuto && VDecl->getType()->getContainedAutoType()) { + Expr *DeduceInit = Init; + // Initializer could be a C++ direct-initializer. Deduction only works if it + // contains exactly one expression. + if (CXXDirectInit) { + if (CXXDirectInit->getNumExprs() == 0) { + // It isn't possible to write this directly, but it is possible to + // end up in this situation with "auto x(some_pack...);" + Diag(CXXDirectInit->getSourceRange().getBegin(), + diag::err_auto_var_init_no_expression) + << VDecl->getDeclName() << VDecl->getType() + << VDecl->getSourceRange(); + RealDecl->setInvalidDecl(); + return; + } else if (CXXDirectInit->getNumExprs() > 1) { + Diag(CXXDirectInit->getExpr(1)->getSourceRange().getBegin(), + diag::err_auto_var_init_multiple_expressions) + << VDecl->getDeclName() << VDecl->getType() + << VDecl->getSourceRange(); + RealDecl->setInvalidDecl(); + return; + } else { + DeduceInit = CXXDirectInit->getExpr(0); + } + } TypeSourceInfo *DeducedType = 0; - if (DeduceAutoType(VDecl->getTypeSourceInfo(), Init, DeducedType) == + if (DeduceAutoType(VDecl->getTypeSourceInfo(), DeduceInit, DeducedType) == DAR_Failed) - DiagnoseAutoDeductionFailure(VDecl, Init); + DiagnoseAutoDeductionFailure(VDecl, DeduceInit); if (!DeducedType) { RealDecl->setInvalidDecl(); return; @@ -6048,25 +6068,26 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, return; } + if (!VDecl->getType()->isDependentType()) { + // A definition must end up with a complete type, which means it must be + // complete with the restriction that an array type might be completed by + // the initializer; note that later code assumes this restriction. + QualType BaseDeclType = VDecl->getType(); + if (const ArrayType *Array = Context.getAsIncompleteArrayType(BaseDeclType)) + BaseDeclType = Array->getElementType(); + if (RequireCompleteType(VDecl->getLocation(), BaseDeclType, + diag::err_typecheck_decl_incomplete_type)) { + RealDecl->setInvalidDecl(); + return; + } - // A definition must end up with a complete type, which means it must be - // complete with the restriction that an array type might be completed by the - // initializer; note that later code assumes this restriction. - QualType BaseDeclType = VDecl->getType(); - if (const ArrayType *Array = Context.getAsIncompleteArrayType(BaseDeclType)) - BaseDeclType = Array->getElementType(); - if (RequireCompleteType(VDecl->getLocation(), BaseDeclType, - diag::err_typecheck_decl_incomplete_type)) { - RealDecl->setInvalidDecl(); - return; + // The variable can not have an abstract class type. + if (RequireNonAbstractType(VDecl->getLocation(), VDecl->getType(), + diag::err_abstract_type_in_decl, + AbstractVariableType)) + VDecl->setInvalidDecl(); } - // The variable can not have an abstract class type. - if (RequireNonAbstractType(VDecl->getLocation(), VDecl->getType(), - diag::err_abstract_type_in_decl, - AbstractVariableType)) - VDecl->setInvalidDecl(); - const VarDecl *Def; if ((Def = VDecl->getDefinition()) && Def != VDecl) { Diag(VDecl->getLocation(), diag::err_redefinition) @@ -6128,9 +6149,15 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, : InitializationKind::CreateCopy(VDecl->getLocation(), Init->getLocStart()); - InitializationSequence InitSeq(*this, Entity, Kind, &Init, 1); + Expr **Args = &Init; + unsigned NumArgs = 1; + if (CXXDirectInit) { + Args = CXXDirectInit->getExprs(); + NumArgs = CXXDirectInit->getNumExprs(); + } + InitializationSequence InitSeq(*this, Entity, Kind, Args, NumArgs); ExprResult Result = InitSeq.Perform(*this, Entity, Kind, - MultiExprArg(*this, &Init, 1), + MultiExprArg(*this, Args,NumArgs), &DclT); if (Result.isInvalid()) { VDecl->setInvalidDecl(); @@ -6266,6 +6293,28 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *RealDecl, Expr *Init, CheckForConstantInitializer(Init, DclT); } + // We will represent direct-initialization similarly to copy-initialization: + // int x(1); -as-> int x = 1; + // ClassType x(a,b,c); -as-> ClassType x = ClassType(a,b,c); + // + // Clients that want to distinguish between the two forms, can check for + // direct initializer using VarDecl::getInitStyle(). + // A major benefit is that clients that don't particularly care about which + // exactly form was it (like the CodeGen) can handle both cases without + // special case code. + + // C++ 8.5p11: + // The form of initialization (using parentheses or '=') is generally + // insignificant, but does matter when the entity being initialized has a + // class type. + if (CXXDirectInit) { + assert(DirectInit && "Call-style initializer must be direct init."); + VDecl->setInitStyle(VarDecl::CallInit); + } else if (DirectInit) { + // This must be list-initialization. No other way is direct-initialization. + VDecl->setInitStyle(VarDecl::ListInit); + } + CheckCompleteVariableDeclaration(VDecl); } @@ -6496,8 +6545,11 @@ void Sema::ActOnUninitializedDecl(Decl *RealDecl, MultiExprArg(*this, 0, 0)); if (Init.isInvalid()) Var->setInvalidDecl(); - else if (Init.get()) + else if (Init.get()) { Var->setInit(MaybeCreateExprWithCleanups(Init.get())); + // This is important for template substitution. + Var->setInitStyle(VarDecl::CallInit); + } CheckCompleteVariableDeclaration(Var); } |