diff options
author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-08-26 18:27:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-08-26 18:27:52 +0000 |
commit | 42c39f39184c5ce9d7f489e5dcb7eec770728a9a (patch) | |
tree | 8b08d164d5ed39d1c44a77b26f63963274bf98ac /lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | |
parent | 8f28f99019e86ae2841d17668811c6a94f5c44f8 (diff) |
When we know that we are parsing a class-name, implicitly construct a
TypenameType if getTypeName is looking at a member of an unknown
specialization. This allows us to properly parse class templates that
derived from type that could only otherwise be described by a typename type,
e.g.,
template<class T> struct X {};
template<typename T> struct Y : public X<T>::X { };
Fixes PR4381.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 16 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp index fec9a075ec..c0e4921f69 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ Sema::DeclGroupPtrTy Sema::ConvertDeclToDeclGroup(DeclPtrTy Ptr) { /// If name lookup results in an ambiguity, this routine will complain /// and then return NULL. Sema::TypeTy *Sema::getTypeName(IdentifierInfo &II, SourceLocation NameLoc, - Scope *S, const CXXScopeSpec *SS) { + Scope *S, const CXXScopeSpec *SS, + bool isClassName) { // C++ [temp.res]p3: // A qualified-id that refers to a type and in which the // nested-name-specifier depends on a template-parameter (14.6.2) @@ -70,8 +71,17 @@ Sema::TypeTy *Sema::getTypeName(IdentifierInfo &II, SourceLocation NameLoc, // // We therefore do not perform any name lookup if the result would // refer to a member of an unknown specialization. - if (SS && isUnknownSpecialization(*SS)) - return 0; + if (SS && isUnknownSpecialization(*SS)) { + if (!isClassName) + return 0; + + // We know from the grammar that this name refers to a type, so build a + // TypenameType node to describe the type. + // FIXME: Record somewhere that this TypenameType node has no "typename" + // keyword associated with it. + return CheckTypenameType((NestedNameSpecifier *)SS->getScopeRep(), + II, SS->getRange()).getAsOpaquePtr(); + } LookupResult Result = LookupParsedName(S, SS, &II, LookupOrdinaryName, false, false); |