When we're inserting a synthesized label declaration for a

forward-looking "goto" statement, make sure to insert it *after* the
last declaration in the identifier resolver's declaration chain that
is either outside of the function/block/method's scope or that is
declared in that function/block/method's specific scope. Previously,
we could end up inserting the label ahead of declarations in inner
scopes, confusing C++ name lookup.

Fixes PR9491/<rdar://problem/9140426> and <rdar://problem/9135994>.

Note that the crash-on-invalid PR9495 is *not* fixed. That's a
separate issue.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@127737 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index 19d96f2ec0..65a372850f 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -500,11 +500,15 @@ void Sema::PushOnScopeChains(NamedDecl *D, Scope *S, bool AddToContext) {
     // isn't strictly lexical, which breaks name lookup. Be careful to insert
     // the label at the appropriate place in the identifier chain.
     for (I = IdResolver.begin(D->getDeclName()); I != IEnd; ++I) {
-      if ((*I)->getLexicalDeclContext()->Encloses(CurContext))
+      DeclContext *IDC = (*I)->getLexicalDeclContext();
+      if (IDC == CurContext) {
+        if (!S->isDeclScope(*I))
+          continue;
+      } else if (IDC->Encloses(CurContext))
         break;
     }
     
-    IdResolver.InsertDecl(I, D);
+    IdResolver.InsertDeclAfter(I, D);
   } else {
     IdResolver.AddDecl(D);
   }