aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-08-25 22:51:20 +0000
committerDouglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>2009-08-25 22:51:20 +0000
commit495c35d291da48c4f5655bbb54d15128ddde0d4d (patch)
treec7374a4cef2354d3548b4273ab3a067c385888ff /lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
parentce3ff2bd3a3386dbc209d3cba4b8769173b274c1 (diff)
Improve support for out-of-line definitions of nested templates and
their members, including member class template, member function templates, and member classes and functions of member templates. To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g., template<typename X> template<typename Y> X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) { return X(); } we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general (i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the current scope specifier to be a current instantiation. Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp30
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
index 188957176b..9c9bff8a08 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ DeclContext *Sema::computeDeclContext(const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
return Record;
if (EnteringContext) {
- // We are entering the context of the nested name specifier, so try to
- // match the nested name specifier to either a primary class template
- // or a class template partial specialization.
if (const TemplateSpecializationType *SpecType
= dyn_cast_or_null<TemplateSpecializationType>(NNS->getAsType())) {
+ // We are entering the context of the nested name specifier, so try to
+ // match the nested name specifier to either a primary class template
+ // or a class template partial specialization.
if (ClassTemplateDecl *ClassTemplate
= dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(
SpecType->getTemplateName().getAsTemplateDecl())) {
@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ DeclContext *Sema::computeDeclContext(const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
= ClassTemplate->findPartialSpecialization(ContextType))
return PartialSpec;
}
+ } else if (const RecordType *RecordT
+ = dyn_cast_or_null<RecordType>(NNS->getAsType())) {
+ // The nested name specifier refers to a member of a class template.
+ return RecordT->getDecl();
}
std::string NNSString;
@@ -260,17 +264,14 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
SourceLocation IdLoc,
SourceLocation CCLoc,
- IdentifierInfo &II) {
+ IdentifierInfo &II,
+ bool EnteringContext) {
NestedNameSpecifier *Prefix
= static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(SS.getScopeRep());
- // If the prefix already refers to an unknown specialization, there
- // is no name lookup to perform. Just build the resulting
- // nested-name-specifier.
- if (Prefix && isUnknownSpecialization(SS))
- return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, &II);
-
- NamedDecl *SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName);
+ NamedDecl *SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName,
+ false, false, SourceLocation(),
+ EnteringContext);
if (SD) {
if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD))
@@ -303,13 +304,16 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
// Fall through to produce an error: we found something that isn't
// a class or a namespace.
- }
+ } else if (SS.isSet() && isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS))
+ return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, &II);
// If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with
// ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error
// messages.
if (!SD)
- SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupOrdinaryName);
+ SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupOrdinaryName,
+ false, false, SourceLocation(),
+ EnteringContext);
unsigned DiagID;
if (SD)
DiagID = diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace;