diff options
author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-08-25 22:51:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2009-08-25 22:51:20 +0000 |
commit | 495c35d291da48c4f5655bbb54d15128ddde0d4d (patch) | |
tree | c7374a4cef2354d3548b4273ab3a067c385888ff /lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp | |
parent | ce3ff2bd3a3386dbc209d3cba4b8769173b274c1 (diff) |
Improve support for out-of-line definitions of nested templates and
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@80044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp | 30 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp index 188957176b..9c9bff8a08 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ DeclContext *Sema::computeDeclContext(const CXXScopeSpec &SS, return Record; if (EnteringContext) { - // We are entering the context of the nested name specifier, so try to - // match the nested name specifier to either a primary class template - // or a class template partial specialization. if (const TemplateSpecializationType *SpecType = dyn_cast_or_null<TemplateSpecializationType>(NNS->getAsType())) { + // We are entering the context of the nested name specifier, so try to + // match the nested name specifier to either a primary class template + // or a class template partial specialization. if (ClassTemplateDecl *ClassTemplate = dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>( SpecType->getTemplateName().getAsTemplateDecl())) { @@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ DeclContext *Sema::computeDeclContext(const CXXScopeSpec &SS, = ClassTemplate->findPartialSpecialization(ContextType)) return PartialSpec; } + } else if (const RecordType *RecordT + = dyn_cast_or_null<RecordType>(NNS->getAsType())) { + // The nested name specifier refers to a member of a class template. + return RecordT->getDecl(); } std::string NNSString; @@ -260,17 +264,14 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, const CXXScopeSpec &SS, SourceLocation IdLoc, SourceLocation CCLoc, - IdentifierInfo &II) { + IdentifierInfo &II, + bool EnteringContext) { NestedNameSpecifier *Prefix = static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(SS.getScopeRep()); - // If the prefix already refers to an unknown specialization, there - // is no name lookup to perform. Just build the resulting - // nested-name-specifier. - if (Prefix && isUnknownSpecialization(SS)) - return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, &II); - - NamedDecl *SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName); + NamedDecl *SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupNestedNameSpecifierName, + false, false, SourceLocation(), + EnteringContext); if (SD) { if (NamespaceDecl *Namespace = dyn_cast<NamespaceDecl>(SD)) @@ -303,13 +304,16 @@ Sema::CXXScopeTy *Sema::ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S, // Fall through to produce an error: we found something that isn't // a class or a namespace. - } + } else if (SS.isSet() && isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS)) + return NestedNameSpecifier::Create(Context, Prefix, &II); // If we didn't find anything during our lookup, try again with // ordinary name lookup, which can help us produce better error // messages. if (!SD) - SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupOrdinaryName); + SD = LookupParsedName(S, &SS, &II, LookupOrdinaryName, + false, false, SourceLocation(), + EnteringContext); unsigned DiagID; if (SD) DiagID = diag::err_expected_class_or_namespace; |